Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LGBT

Skittles

(160,142 posts)

4. an EXPERIMENT?

Reply to aeromanKC (Reply #1)

Tue Nov 19, 2019, 05:18 AM

Nov 2019

W.T.F.

you know, it was never time for a black man to become president - until one did

it was never time for a woman to be president - until a woman won (OH YES SHE DID)

no one ever asked if it was time for a FASCIST BUFFOON to be "president" but HERE WE ARE

STOP SAYING IT'S NOT TIME

* IT IS *

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Pastor tells Democrats to reject Pete Buttigieg because 'it is not the time' for a gay President [View all] Behind the Aegis Nov 2019 OP

I agree aeromanKC Nov 2019 #1

an EXPERIMENT? Skittles Nov 2019 #4

Yeah Cosmocat Nov 2019 #5

You wrote what I was thinking - exactly Rhiannon12866 Nov 2019 #6

However, the black man had been a US Senator, representing a large state. pnwmom Nov 2019 #7

Why is he the best candidate by far in our lifetimes? He's the 37 yr old Mayor of a city of pnwmom Nov 2019 #9

But, but for a lot of Americans in 2016 is was time for..... KY_EnviroGuy Nov 2019 #2

see that's the thing with these sanctimonious assholes Skittles Nov 2019 #3

I wouldn't have said it wasn't Barney Frank's time. But he's not 37. n/t pnwmom Nov 2019 #8

Loss of tax exempt status JT45242 Nov 2019 #10

As a Christian myself, I agree! UrbScotty Nov 2019 #11