Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

MillennialDem

(2,367 posts)
40. Not even sure if you're saying I go to gun control meetings and mock me for that, or if you're
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 12:29 AM
Apr 2016

mocking me for being a keyboard kommando.

Scared"? I'm "scared" enough to even have a fire extinguisher in several rooms of my house and in my car, I'm "scared" enough to always wear seatbelts in the car and a helmet when riding my cycle, and I realize the world isn't always the safe place some ignorant blissninnies think it is, so I'm also "scared" enough to carry a concealed weapon where it's legal. And I train others to carry as well. "


False equivalence. A seat belt or a fire extinguisher can't accidentally or intentionally kill* you (or someone else) and generally speaking only do good (other than potentially for your wallet). I never said the world is a safe place, I merely am stating you're almost as likely to get struck by lightning as you are to kill an assailant, and you're more likely to use that gun on yourself than on an assailant. But hey, it's your funeral. Just hope you never accidentally clip a third party.

*Yes I know you could in theory kill someone with a seat belt or a fire extinguisher. But those "weapons" are no more dangerous than other, readily available non-gun weapons, tools, and even stuff you can find in the woods. And accidental killings with fire extinguishers and seat belts are unheard of.
This cannot be counted as a defensive gun use GreydeeThos Apr 2016 #1
Logical circle jerk. mikeysnot Apr 2016 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author CompanyFirstSergeant Apr 2016 #3
There is no "(alleged) relative infrequency" it is a mathematical infrequency. Cannot be argued. MillennialDem Apr 2016 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author CompanyFirstSergeant Apr 2016 #14
How about this statistic MillennialDem Apr 2016 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author CompanyFirstSergeant Apr 2016 #18
I'm not sure what you mean by "recruiting stations"? Military? But would I volunteer to MillennialDem Apr 2016 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author CompanyFirstSergeant Apr 2016 #20
Armor (as in armored vehicles). If they'd let this old girl in at this point. MillennialDem Apr 2016 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author CompanyFirstSergeant Apr 2016 #22
Easy, if the muppet refuses to come out, leave but throw a GPS on their car and figure out their MillennialDem Apr 2016 #25
Funny how somebody claiming to be progressive loves the idea of a police state so much DonP Apr 2016 #37
Nah, I just rely on not being perpetually scared my whole life. I feel bad for children of gunners MillennialDem Apr 2016 #38
Sure you do DonP Apr 2016 #39
Not even sure if you're saying I go to gun control meetings and mock me for that, or if you're MillennialDem Apr 2016 #40
Let me help you out here DonP Apr 2016 #41
I do better than that MillennialDem Apr 2016 #42
Good lord, please stop using the discredited Kellerman study! DonP Apr 2016 #43
The problem is MillennialDem Apr 2016 #44
Thats an opinion, and one not very well grounded in reality. beevul Apr 2016 #45
So, bottom line, you're just another online whiner about guns DonP Apr 2016 #46
Who is a moron? Marengo Apr 2016 #49
"Muppet"? What is this "muppet" you speak of? Marengo Apr 2016 #48
Your "facts" are disingenuous... Eleanors38 Apr 2016 #32
1. Defensive gun use has never been falsifiably studied and 2. It doesn't include MillennialDem Apr 2016 #34
Ah, the anticipated "Self Defense Denier" arrives, spews and departs DonP Apr 2016 #4
Few deny that some guns are used in self defense. The problem is more people die from gun MillennialDem Apr 2016 #13
An accurate scientific study is not possible, it will always be an "estimate" DonP Apr 2016 #15
You could do a scientific study. It would be costly, but it could be done. I also never said the CDC MillennialDem Apr 2016 #17
So, how do you propose to scientifically study "unreported incidents"? DonP Apr 2016 #23
Cameras on people with guns and without guns... MillennialDem Apr 2016 #24
Yeah, that whole 5th amendment thing is over rated too. DonP Apr 2016 #26
They would obviously be volunteering. MillennialDem Apr 2016 #27
Are you suggesting that people under surveillance... discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2016 #28
If you want to go by justified gun uses, you're going to pull your gun regardless of whether MillennialDem Apr 2016 #29
Unless you propose making a body cam mandatory... discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2016 #30
I think if you sweeten the pot with a money for participation in the study you're MillennialDem Apr 2016 #31
People being watched act differently than those not watched. discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2016 #33
If you have to justifiably pull a gun, you should do it. It might cut down on the MillennialDem Apr 2016 #35
Agreed, you should. discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2016 #36
And I thought it would be difficult to top safe rooms constructed with derelict refrigerators... Marengo Apr 2016 #47
K&R discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2016 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author CompanyFirstSergeant Apr 2016 #6
That's why I included that last paragraph DonP Apr 2016 #7
Guns protecting lives....now that's how it's supposed to be. ileus Apr 2016 #8
Hate he had to shoot someone TeddyR Apr 2016 #9
Shot in the shoulder and leg shadowrider Apr 2016 #10
Also interesting that the neighbor reported hearing about 13 shots TeddyR Apr 2016 #11
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»"Attempted Robbery N...»Reply #40