Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sarisataka

(21,304 posts)
4. As Control Advocates have pointed out so often
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 09:40 AM
Apr 2016

Taxi driver is regularly the most dangerous occupation in the country. So if you are working the most dangerous occupation and are in a high-crime area but don't need a firearm one wonders why do even the police need firearms?

Apparently the only valid reason to have a firearm is if somebody has given you advance notice that they are going to kill you. Then they will consider it with the caveat that they want to make sure it will not escalate the situation.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Democrats Plan to Roll Ba...»Reply #4