Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
Showing Original Post only (View all)acceptable reasons to kill - conclusions [View all]
Last edited Tue Sep 27, 2016, 12:55 PM - Edit history (1)
My original questions:
It's the gun group and we all know where it's going. Self-defense is a major reason given for owning a firearm. Is there an acceptable reason to kill? Is there ever?
I'm against capital punishment.
I think police kill far too often.
I don't hunt but I have no problems with non-trophy hunters.
So my question: is it ever acceptable to kill, on purpose?
If so, under what circumstances?
If not, is that an absolute never?
In either case, why do feel that way?
Thanks
I'm against capital punishment.
I think police kill far too often.
I don't hunt but I have no problems with non-trophy hunters.
So my question: is it ever acceptable to kill, on purpose?
If so, under what circumstances?
If not, is that an absolute never?
In either case, why do feel that way?
Thanks
ETA:
As of 1 PM ET on 27 September -
Observation/summary of replies:
There were no replies which stated that it's never acceptable to kill.
There were replies stating outright or strongly implying that killing in an act of self-defense is acceptable.
Conclusions:
Killing (especially in defense) is acceptable.
I may yet hear more from those opposed but they have as yet not been motivated to share.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
36 replies, 4669 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
One quibble: Fair-chase trophy hunting is ecologically sound; in fact beneficial
Eleanors38
Sep 2016
#3
"If someone is trying to kill you, then you should try to Kill them right back!"
mackdaddy
Sep 2016
#4
"The happenstance taking of human life in defense of innocence is to mourned but never lamented."
Nuclear Unicorn
Sep 2016
#31
If the posts posts are to be believed the only acceptable use of deadly force is
Nuclear Unicorn
Sep 2016
#15
If someone attacks you with a lethal weapon, are you going ask if you understand the situation...
Marengo
Sep 2016
#29
re: "While the death of the attacker is an acceptable outcome, it is not the goal."
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Sep 2016
#28