Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: acceptable reasons to kill - conclusions [View all]JonathanRackham
(1,604 posts)1. If you eat, you are directly or indirectly respnsible for death.
What is the threshold of acceptable intelligence? One person's bacon is anothers living room buddy.
If my life is threatened then I have a right and need to exert an opposite and equal force to preserve my life and my family's life.
With reguards to meat, eat what you need and not to excess. Do not waste.
In a philosophical way it's native American in concept.
Bad news, in the end we all die, no one gets out alive.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
One quibble: Fair-chase trophy hunting is ecologically sound; in fact beneficial
Eleanors38
Sep 2016
#3
"If someone is trying to kill you, then you should try to Kill them right back!"
mackdaddy
Sep 2016
#4
"The happenstance taking of human life in defense of innocence is to mourned but never lamented."
Nuclear Unicorn
Sep 2016
#31
If the posts posts are to be believed the only acceptable use of deadly force is
Nuclear Unicorn
Sep 2016
#15
If someone attacks you with a lethal weapon, are you going ask if you understand the situation...
Marengo
Sep 2016
#29
re: "While the death of the attacker is an acceptable outcome, it is not the goal."
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Sep 2016
#28