Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: im curious to know [View all]discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,593 posts)56. Just a few points and issues
When we say:
All of our rights, even the ones enumerated in the Bill of Rights, are restricted. You can't shout "Fire!" in a crowd. You can't threaten to kill the president. You can't publish someone else's words as your own. We have copyright laws and libel laws and slander laws. We have the FCC to regulate our radio and television content. We have plenty of restrictions on our First Amendment rights.
...what we mean is these acts are against the law and you may suffer legal consequences for them.
I have a pet peeve about the very term "gun-control" because the only real control in the world is self-control. Referring to laws as "gun-control" has infected the thinking of the general public that these laws actually control something. They don't. Control is a myth. Why is it we don't call laws against murder "murder control"?
I suggest we move into the 21st century where an internet video can teach you to repair your clothes dryer, change your disc brake pads and build a full-auto rifle. Using archaic and inaccurate terminology in attempts to collect the thoughts and will of the people on an important topic only serve to confuse the issue and impede bringing any priorities to their legislators attention.
An exception to the 1A is prior restraint: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prior_restraint
...is censorship imposed, usually by a government, on expression that prohibits particular instances of expression.
...
In some countries (e.g., United States, Argentina) prior restraint by the government is forbidden, subject to certain exceptions, by a constitution.
...
In some countries (e.g., United States, Argentina) prior restraint by the government is forbidden, subject to certain exceptions, by a constitution.
My view of the RKBA is that it is a logical consequence of the universal right to life in that a right to life implies a right to self-defense. I find it amusing that many refer to "frontier justice" and "lawless old West" saying that without laws on buying and carrying guns, it would be like the OK Corral. Tombstone, AZ in 1881 had gun control and restrictions on carrying in town which, in fact, was the cause for the famous shootout.
The more things change, the more they remain the same and, regardless of what may be demonstrated by the events of the day, lots of folks are seemingly unable to learn anything.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Bazooka" is an archaic term, and general used only by those with limited knowledge and ....
Marengo
Apr 2017
#26
Essentially my reaction towards someone who uses "bazooka". It is however useful in the sense...
Marengo
Apr 2017
#37
Ridiculous. On the contrary, it weakens you argument. Please do continue using the term though
Marengo
Apr 2017
#41
I noticed you haven't responded to any posts on asymmetrical warfare in this thread...
Marengo
Apr 2017
#50
What are your qualifications for accurately assessing who can or cannot successfully engage...
Marengo
Apr 2017
#55
I submit that the very nature of asymmetrical warfare includes that any instance is successful.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Apr 2017
#57
Still very curious to know what qualifies you to accurately determine who may, or may not,...
Marengo
Apr 2017
#59
"(Y)our/our peashooters will be worthless" Ahem. Just last week in Afghanistan:
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2017
#32
The common 18th century definition of "free state" could indicate either for or against...
Marengo
Apr 2017
#25
Not changing. It is written they that live by the sword shall die by the sword.
caroldansen
Apr 2017
#4
re: "It is written they that live by the sword shall die by the sword."
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Apr 2017
#8