Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

soryang

(3,306 posts)
4. I think there may be conceivable scenarios where they might be useful
Sat Sep 1, 2018, 07:24 PM
Sep 2018

...in the event of some sort of collapse of central authority of the Pyongyang regime and a general breakdown in governance in North Korea, to perform the function of securing, safeguarding and perhaps in limited circumstances assisting in the removal of nuclear weapons. I've seen one US think tank study anticipating such developments presented during the earlier so called strategic patience period.

The notion that they could be used as a "nuclear counterforce" to preemptively eliminate the nuclear threat, in conjunction with other offensive attacks, in the plans as described by this program, not just in this episode but in greater detail in one or more previous episodes, is fundamentally flawed.




Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Training is best when you train for what you will be doing. Crutchez_CuiBono Aug 2018 #1
Sounds like routine stuff to me Sherman A1 Aug 2018 #2
Training is good DashOneBravo Sep 2018 #3
I think there may be conceivable scenarios where they might be useful soryang Sep 2018 #4
I haven't seen that DashOneBravo Sep 2018 #5
Good points soryang Sep 2018 #6
Thanks. I read it DashOneBravo Sep 2018 #7
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»National Security & Defense»Postulated Role of Specia...»Reply #4