Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
6. Well, they didn't exactly still have polio, but they had the residual effects of it.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 05:30 PM
Feb 2016

And still, by 1962 polio was moving rapidly from public consciousness. We all knew people who'd had polio and were still around (my father-in-law, now deceased, got it in an epidemic in about 1918), but it wasn't in the forefront of what very many people thought about by then. So I do find that way of trying to characterize that year to be distinctly odd. Off, even, because it doesn't relate to what most people were thinking about in any way, shape, or form. Better to have referenced JFK or the Bay of Pigs or something to the effect that the World Series was still being played in the daytime.

It suggests a carelessness with facts. One of my quirks is that I tend to be a stickler for facts and for details being accurate.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Writing»This message was self-del...»Reply #6