Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProfessorGAC

(70,406 posts)
8. The Raw Numbers Do Not Support Accuracy
Sat Jun 22, 2024, 12:11 PM
Jun 2024

Reading the book won't change the raw data.
The women are still fantastic runners no matter what.
And, the physiology myths were just rooted in bias & stupidity. I don't need to read the book to know those were just dumb. Of course they're going to be debunked. They were nonsense in the first place.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Sports»How women runners debunke...»Reply #8