Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Imagine a world without faith or religion. [View all]guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)44. Speaking of Stalin:
Hitler vs. Stalin: Who Killed More?
Timothy Snyder
March 10, 2011 Issue
Who was worse, Hitler or Stalin?
In the second half of the twentieth century, Americans were taught to see both Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union as the greatest of evils. Hitler was worse, because his regime propagated the unprecedented horror of the Holocaust, the attempt to eradicate an entire people on racial grounds. Yet Stalin was also worse, because his regime killed far, far more people, tens of millions it was often claimed, in the endless wastes of the Gulag. For decades, and even today, this confidence about the difference between the two regimesquality versus quantityhas set the ground rules for the politics of memory. Even historians of the Holocaust generally take for granted that Stalin killed more people than Hitler, thus placing themselves under greater pressure to stress the special character of the Holocaust, since this is what made the Nazi regime worse than the Stalinist one.
Timothy Snyder
March 10, 2011 Issue
Who was worse, Hitler or Stalin?
In the second half of the twentieth century, Americans were taught to see both Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union as the greatest of evils. Hitler was worse, because his regime propagated the unprecedented horror of the Holocaust, the attempt to eradicate an entire people on racial grounds. Yet Stalin was also worse, because his regime killed far, far more people, tens of millions it was often claimed, in the endless wastes of the Gulag. For decades, and even today, this confidence about the difference between the two regimesquality versus quantityhas set the ground rules for the politics of memory. Even historians of the Holocaust generally take for granted that Stalin killed more people than Hitler, thus placing themselves under greater pressure to stress the special character of the Holocaust, since this is what made the Nazi regime worse than the Stalinist one.
https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2011/03/10/hitler-vs-stalin-who-killed-more/
War is an aspect of tribalism. And we both know that leaders can think of many reasons to start a war, but power is at the base of it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
98 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Since crusades and pogroms are religious in nature, I think we would not have those particular forms
marylandblue
Dec 2018
#35
Kinda funny how you must point to the most totalitarian examples as your proof of concept
Major Nikon
Dec 2018
#68
Waitwaitwait. You just ridiculed me for speculating because you didn't like my answers.
DetlefK
Dec 2018
#23
Irrelevant. You have two contradicting opinions when talking to two different people.
DetlefK
Dec 2018
#61
A world that never had religion would have people very different from ourselves
marylandblue
Dec 2018
#28
Religion and faith are not bad and are good. However many in today's churches
lancelyons
Dec 2018
#31
The thought crossed my mind that if we consider other species, we might find an example.
gtar100
Dec 2018
#59
I suppose if one is prone to dichotomy they would be satisfied that all the answers are no
Major Nikon
Dec 2018
#66