Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Let he who is without cognitive bias cast the first lecture. [View all]Major Nikon
(36,900 posts)7. You didn't understand the question
First of all what you do or don't believe isn't actually all that clear since you have claimed to be both a deist and a theist which are mutually contradictory terms.
Next, what you do or don't believe is irrelevant. What I'm asking for is a logical argument for theism, not an emotional one for whatever it is you believe or don't.
Finally, your assumption on what I can or can't prove regarding atheism is obviously from a position of ignorance at best or at worst duplicitous.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No, his "point" was to accuse me of making an error by referrign to it in the singular.
guillaumeb
Dec 2018
#64
"I don't think anybody ever had a spiritual experience hacking away on a laptop. "
Lordquinton
Dec 2018
#42
Meanwhile you reveal you can't tell the difference between a fact and a claim
Major Nikon
Dec 2018
#39