Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
68. He was incorrect.
Wed Dec 26, 2018, 08:44 PM
Dec 2018

The title uses the singular to indicate a condition. MM was incorrect, as the link shows.

And actually MM was the first to use the term to discredit theists.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/1218301931

Sorry, but the threads contradict your attempt at defense. And it is clearly not working.

True. eom KPN Dec 2018 #1
Everybody has them. Turbineguy Dec 2018 #2
Understood. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #6
No, Guillaumeb. Cognitive biases and emotional decisions MineralMan Dec 2018 #3
I don't think you understand what he's trying to say Major Nikon Dec 2018 #8
Oh, no, I understand what he's trying to say just fine. MineralMan Dec 2018 #12
I'm not sure his research is limited to just that one site Major Nikon Dec 2018 #14
Well, there are also random blogs on Patheos. MineralMan Dec 2018 #16
So what is your logical argument for theism? Major Nikon Dec 2018 #4
My argument, guillaumeb Dec 2018 #5
You didn't understand the question Major Nikon Dec 2018 #7
I removed the ad hominem from your response, guillaumeb Dec 2018 #9
Sure, because calling bullshit on bullshit is ad hominem Major Nikon Dec 2018 #10
Reverting to your default setting? guillaumeb Dec 2018 #11
Your first fuckup is claiming that I don't find dialog with theists here Major Nikon Dec 2018 #13
OK. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #15
Just one cognitive bias? MineralMan Dec 2018 #17
The word one was your addition. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #18
You wrote: MineralMan Dec 2018 #20
Cognitive bias describes behavior. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #22
Read the article. MineralMan Dec 2018 #23
Did you read the link? guillaumeb Dec 2018 #24
Goodbye. MineralMan Dec 2018 #25
Goodbye. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #31
He clearly read the link Lordquinton Dec 2018 #41
Neither of you did, in my opinion. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #47
So you read the article too, right? Lordquinton Dec 2018 #62
No, his "point" was to accuse me of making an error by referrign to it in the singular. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #64
And he was not incorrect, was he? Lordquinton Dec 2018 #67
He was incorrect. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #68
"Cognitive Biases or Errors Are at the Heart of Religion" Lordquinton Dec 2018 #70
... Major Nikon Dec 2018 #69
One reason you complain about the lack of dialog... Major Nikon Dec 2018 #19
I provided an answer. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #21
OK, so "faith" is your idea of a logical argument Major Nikon Dec 2018 #27
Not at all what I actually said. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #34
Please continue as this just keeps getting better Major Nikon Dec 2018 #37
Incorrect on your part. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #43
Please continue... Major Nikon Dec 2018 #48
Sad. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #49
Please continue to say you didn't say what you said Major Nikon Dec 2018 #51
Logical violetpastille Dec 2018 #26
What is a spiritual experience? wasupaloopa Dec 2018 #29
Here was mine violetpastille Dec 2018 #30
Church services provide a community. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #35
Humans need community. violetpastille Dec 2018 #36
Very well put. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #32
Tell us again how "faith" is your logical argument Major Nikon Dec 2018 #38
You are misframing what I said. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #44
Thanks for giving me another opportunity to prove your faceplant Major Nikon Dec 2018 #50
Unintentional humor on your part. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #52
Thanks for the unintentional laugh Major Nikon Dec 2018 #59
"I don't think anybody ever had a spiritual experience hacking away on a laptop. " Lordquinton Dec 2018 #42
If the Buddha, or Jesus or Mohammed violetpastille Dec 2018 #63
I can attest that many actual "hackers" Voltaire2 Dec 2018 #71
I said "I don't think that" violetpastille Dec 2018 #72
You cannot prove a negative so your question to athiests is irrational. wasupaloopa Dec 2018 #28
I never talk about proof. I talk about faith. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #33
Meanwhile you reveal you can't tell the difference between a fact and a claim Major Nikon Dec 2018 #39
And you continue to reveal your agenda, and tactics. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #45
True Major Nikon Dec 2018 #53
The first citation reveals that you misframed my response. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #54
Please continue to claim that Major Nikon Dec 2018 #60
That makes no sense. You base it all on your belief wasupaloopa Dec 2018 #40
I have faith. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #46
I find it interesting that you always focus on the unprovable Eko Dec 2018 #55
What an interesting response. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #56
Here. Eko Dec 2018 #57
Okay. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #58
Great. Eko Dec 2018 #61
He won't Major Nikon Dec 2018 #65
I know. Eko Dec 2018 #66
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Let he who is without cog...»Reply #68