Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: How is 'Jesus Son of God' different from sons of Greek gods? Ever hear sermon on this? [View all]struggle4progress
(120,314 posts)54. The literalists take the view that the texts must be accepted as accurate accounts
of whatever they relate. I can't make sense of that view: it doesn't seem to me helpful for reading the texts or for any other purpose
You seem to take a fun-house mirror approach to the literalists' view, namely, that the texts cannot contain anything that might be helpful or informative in any way -- and then because Graves, if he were right, seems to you to discredit the texts, you apparently conclude that we should all accept the nonsense Graves promoted
The notion that cultural ideas and mythologies have long complicated histories, involving appropriation and transformation of elements from earlier and even external cultures can be a useful guide in investigation, but it's not a substitute for careful work
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
How is 'Jesus Son of God' different from sons of Greek gods? Ever hear sermon on this? [View all]
bobbieinok
Feb 2019
OP
IIRC there was a major debate in 80s? re validity of claims that can't be falsified
bobbieinok
Feb 2019
#31
Or, an admission that human intelliegence is not capable of understanding? eom
guillaumeb
Feb 2019
#38
Or a willful embrace of ignorance, intellectual fatalism and laziness, as sacred
Bretton Garcia
Feb 2019
#39
You were asked to define a word YOU used yourself as YOU define it, not "others"
Major Nikon
Feb 2019
#20
Genuine studies of cultural histories are interesting and informative. But
struggle4progress
Feb 2019
#43
The literalists take the view that the texts must be accepted as accurate accounts
struggle4progress
Feb 2019
#54
"A bit different, but not so very different" doesn't make for a long enough sermon
RockRaven
Feb 2019
#27