Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: How Oxford and Peter Singer drove me from atheism to Jesus [View all]MineralMan
(147,578 posts)29. I find personal anecdotes to be very interesting when they are
posted by the person who experienced them. The discussion that such anecdotes often create is interesting. I'm more puzzled, though, by second hand postings of someone's anecdote. Usually there is some reason the person posts someone else's story, but there can't be any real discussion, since the story-teller is not present.
For example, even after I visited the full article at the link in the OP, I was left with questions about what things Singer said led the story-teller to her decision. But, I can't ask that question, because she is not a participant in this thread. Nor can the person who posted an excerpt of that story answer, because he has no more information than I do.
It's just odd, I think.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
178 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Whatever an individual feels they need to give their life meaning is their business,
The Velveteen Ocelot
May 2019
#3
It's a little difficult to understand how the implications of her atheism were incompatible with ...
Jim__
May 2019
#4
Good, so I expect you'll never argue about the definition of atheism again.
marylandblue
May 2019
#91
I argued only for expanding the definition to include those who might believe. eom
guillaumeb
May 2019
#141
If their belief is that atheism is not a belief, then that is how they define their atheism.
marylandblue
May 2019
#151
People publish personal anecdotes all the time. Obviously it meant something to the author,
The Velveteen Ocelot
May 2019
#24
I've read "Mere Christianity," and although it's a beautifully-written explanation
The Velveteen Ocelot
May 2019
#43
You're the one who has claimed to have a giant fan club sending you private messages.
trotsky
May 2019
#97
I didn't know anything about Singer before, but I see he has a unique moral perspective
marylandblue
May 2019
#124
I think is a general discomfort with the idea that there is no ultimate justice.
marylandblue
May 2019
#129
Based on everything you've said before, no category is relevant for any purpose.
marylandblue
May 2019
#152
I did research the word. And I know a postmodern narrative when I see one.
marylandblue
May 2019
#169
Well now that you know why I picked that word, perhaps you could consider
marylandblue
May 2019
#178
I was paraphrasing a quick survey of her impression of what he seems to be saying.
marylandblue
May 2019
#133
My thoughts are that for someone who apparently got her PhD from Cambridge, logic or clear writing
muriel_volestrangler
May 2019
#135
Irving-Stonebraker writes a cliched "captivity," then "conversion narrative"
Bretton Garcia
May 2019
#136
I am convinced it's a narrative crafted to appeal to evangelical christians.
AtheistCrusader
May 2019
#140