Religion

Act_of_Reparation

(9,116 posts)

61. It has already been noted:

Thu Jul 25, 2019, 08:39 AM

Jul 2019

Parks & Rec typically prohibits street clothes, like leggings, from use in public pools because the materials used in their manufacture are too absorbent or break down in pool water, and thus pose a risk to public property, others, and the would-be swimmers themselves. These rules and regulations have secular purpose, do not have the primary effect of advancing or inhibiting religion, and do not constitute excessive governmental entanglement with religion.

You should probably address that.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

62 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

American Muslim Women Are Fighting For The Freedom To Swim [View all] guillaumeb Jul 2019 OP

They _have_ the freedom to swim. Ron Obvious Jul 2019 #1

The restrictions are targeted against Muslim women. guillaumeb Jul 2019 #3

Nonsense. These rules are in effect in every pool I've ever swum in for decades Ron Obvious Jul 2019 #5

You have the right to that opinion. eom guillaumeb Jul 2019 #7

I've seen people kicked out of this kind of facility. Igel Jul 2019 #14

Many things can interfere with filtration systems. guillaumeb Jul 2019 #18

The wrong conclusion, it would seem. Act_of_Reparation Jul 2019 #43

In the US? AtheistCrusader Jul 2019 #47

Gotta make it about religious persecution though. trotsky Jul 2019 #10

Bingo n/t customerserviceguy Jul 2019 #11

Given that these rules specifically target religious dress, guillaumeb Jul 2019 #12

Except they're not edhopper Jul 2019 #16

You gave your opinion. guillaumeb Jul 2019 #20

It clearly states they were wearing t-shirts. edhopper Jul 2019 #22

T shirts are off limits for all JenniferJuniper Jul 2019 #26

It wasn't a burkini AncientGeezer Jul 2019 #27

The article doesn't say they were banned from wearing that. AtheistCrusader Jul 2019 #46

They don't. That is just your (erroneous) opinion. trotsky Jul 2019 #38

The rules against wearing street clothes in pools Mariana Jul 2019 #50

the clothing restrictions are unnecessary and stupid. demigoddess Jul 2019 #9

The same argument could be made about top coverings for wqmen. guillaumeb Jul 2019 #13

has been made in the past but society was not able to face the prospect. demigoddess Jul 2019 #37

True. guillaumeb Jul 2019 #42

The clothing rules are very common. I am guessing she'll AJT Jul 2019 #2

Yes, they are unfortunately quite common. guillaumeb Jul 2019 #4

The more you use that word, the less meaning and power it will have. Ron Obvious Jul 2019 #6

What is nonsensical is denying the obvious. guillaumeb Jul 2019 #8

It's a no Street Clothes rule edhopper Jul 2019 #17

Burkinis are designed to be swim wear. guillaumeb Jul 2019 #19

Your article says it wasn't a burkini.. AncientGeezer Jul 2019 #28

The article is not limited to that one incident. eom guillaumeb Jul 2019 #30

Perhaps in the Huffpo article you missed the sign picture... AncientGeezer Jul 2019 #33

If you read the entire article, guillaumeb Jul 2019 #34

I read the entire article....your C&P adresses a specific event..with a teeshirt AncientGeezer Jul 2019 #36

He doesn't care. trotsky Jul 2019 #39

Not my 1st dealings w/him-her.... AncientGeezer Jul 2019 #40

"no such bans exist in the United States" AtheistCrusader Jul 2019 #45

He can't even help it. trotsky Jul 2019 #53

Your example has nothing to do with some French cities banning burkini's. Actually, Paris bans all emmaverybo Jul 2019 #51

You demonstrate the ability to read, yet you don't seem to realize she wasn't wearing a burkini. AtheistCrusader Jul 2019 #55

Ruhee Kapadia should stop abusing her daughter and let her live a normal life. Voltaire2 Jul 2019 #15

Perhaps you should stop imposing your own values. guillaumeb Jul 2019 #21

I'm not imposing anything. Voltaire2 Jul 2019 #23

How do you feel about female mutilation edhopper Jul 2019 #24

My suggestion is to start another post. guillaumeb Jul 2019 #25

OMG! edhopper Jul 2019 #29

No, I will not participate in an unrelated question. guillaumeb Jul 2019 #31

So discussions of the religious reasons behind edhopper Jul 2019 #41

The silence(avoidance) is deafening. AncientGeezer Jul 2019 #35

This message was self-deleted by its author mr_liberal Jul 2019 #32

They didn't want her to drown. AtheistCrusader Jul 2019 #44

A very convincing argument. guillaumeb Jul 2019 #48

This message was self-deleted by its author AncientGeezer Jul 2019 #49

The religion I follow, under the Lord Triton, requires I enter earth's holy waters totally nude ... mr_lebowski Jul 2019 #52

And you should follow that religion. guillaumeb Jul 2019 #54

This is Great! Voltaire2 Jul 2019 #56

Once again, a very few posters insist on arguing with a straw opponent. guillaumeb Jul 2019 #57

Straw has more substance. Voltaire2 Jul 2019 #59

Content and substance are irrelevant Major Nikon Jul 2019 #58

Consistent indeed. trotsky Jul 2019 #60

It has already been noted: Act_of_Reparation Jul 2019 #61

Still not going to walk this trash, false-correlation travesty of journalism article back, huh? AtheistCrusader Jul 2019 #62