Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Does anyone here think the Nativity is not pure myth? [View all]Major Nikon
(36,900 posts)7. The story of the nativity appears in later gospels
It deals with a particular problem that Jesus was well known to be from Nazareth, but the messianic prophecy requires the messiah to be from Bethlehem. The myth doesnt line up with historical fact. Supposedly the couple travels to Bethlehem for the census, but there was no Roman census for Bethlehem or Nazareth around the time of Jesus alleged birth, and even if there were it wouldnt have required one to travel for it.
Im sure there are those who will try and pull the metaphor card when faced with irreconcilable facts, but all they would really be doing is creating more questions while not really answering anything.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Four gospels, four different birth treatments. The message was more important than fact.h
Karadeniz
Dec 2019
#5
That was why I said "treatments." Mark doesn't give a birth story, so apparently the birth was
Karadeniz
Dec 2019
#25
"Historians in general agree that there was an historical Jesus who preached in Palestine"
Cuthbert Allgood
Dec 2019
#37
I think we cannot make such firm conclusions given how little information we have
Steelrolled
Dec 2019
#33