Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Does anyone here think the Nativity is not pure myth? [View all]Steelrolled
(2,022 posts)22. I agree that ultimately, the birth story would have a single source
in the personages of Jesus' parents. I expect the story would have then fanned out through the generations, and the gospel authors might have gotten information from nearby spots on the fan.
Having said that, the stories have their differences. Only Luke talked about the "census" for example. And based on my life experience, it is very possible that as the story was passed down, some people thought that the census aspect was very significant and interesting, while others thought it was immaterial and mundane.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
Four gospels, four different birth treatments. The message was more important than fact.h
Karadeniz
Dec 2019
#5
That was why I said "treatments." Mark doesn't give a birth story, so apparently the birth was
Karadeniz
Dec 2019
#25
"Historians in general agree that there was an historical Jesus who preached in Palestine"
Cuthbert Allgood
Dec 2019
#37
I think we cannot make such firm conclusions given how little information we have
Steelrolled
Dec 2019
#33