Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Does anyone here think the Nativity is not pure myth? [View all]Steelrolled
(2,022 posts)33. I think we cannot make such firm conclusions given how little information we have
outside of the Bible. With respect to the birth of Jesus, it is perhaps surprising that
two of the four Gospels really don't mention it at all. Maybe their dogs ate their crib
notes
Of the other two Gospels, only Luke mentions the census story, the manger, and the
shepherds, and only Matthew mentions the magi and Herod. They agree mainly on
the names of the parents, the immaculate conception, and the location of Bethlehem.
You really should read them, given there are only two accounts and they are fairly
short.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Four gospels, four different birth treatments. The message was more important than fact.h
Karadeniz
Dec 2019
#5
That was why I said "treatments." Mark doesn't give a birth story, so apparently the birth was
Karadeniz
Dec 2019
#25
"Historians in general agree that there was an historical Jesus who preached in Palestine"
Cuthbert Allgood
Dec 2019
#37
I think we cannot make such firm conclusions given how little information we have
Steelrolled
Dec 2019
#33