Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Does anyone here think the Nativity is not pure myth? [View all]mvd
(65,454 posts)43. One of the reasons I am spiritual rather than religious..
Is the ability to form my own opinions and practice my faith how I like. I do not take the Bible literally. Much of it, especially the Old Testament, is just stories. I think the accounts of Jesus were sometimes embellished to please Rome and to grow the new faith. I think the Virgin Birth and literally being Son of God defy reason. I think being sent by God and the Resurrection are more likely. Miracles supposedly happen even today. And yes, he could have been born in a manger and into poverty. You dont have to take everything word for word to enjoy the general message.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Four gospels, four different birth treatments. The message was more important than fact.h
Karadeniz
Dec 2019
#5
That was why I said "treatments." Mark doesn't give a birth story, so apparently the birth was
Karadeniz
Dec 2019
#25
"Historians in general agree that there was an historical Jesus who preached in Palestine"
Cuthbert Allgood
Dec 2019
#37
I think we cannot make such firm conclusions given how little information we have
Steelrolled
Dec 2019
#33