Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Does anyone here think the Nativity is not pure myth? [View all]uriel1972
(4,261 posts)48. of the four gospels
One has a jewish trial of Jesus, one has a roman trial, one has both and another has neither... reliable eyewitness accounts, oh yeah and don't get me started about who did or did not find Jesus at the cave after the resurrection... or indeed if he was found at the cave.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
Four gospels, four different birth treatments. The message was more important than fact.h
Karadeniz
Dec 2019
#5
That was why I said "treatments." Mark doesn't give a birth story, so apparently the birth was
Karadeniz
Dec 2019
#25
"Historians in general agree that there was an historical Jesus who preached in Palestine"
Cuthbert Allgood
Dec 2019
#37
I think we cannot make such firm conclusions given how little information we have
Steelrolled
Dec 2019
#33