Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Christian Liberals & Progressive People of Faith
In reply to the discussion: Let me begin by stating that it is not my intent to limit or prohibit anyone's privilege to [View all]old as dirt
(1,972 posts)51. It's not a term that logicians use.
It's just a silly term that gets thrown around by folks seeking to justify their (ir)religious beliefs on the internet.
The best that a logician can make of it is the negation of a statement with a sequence of existential quantifiers followed by an atomic formula with no quantifiers.
You did click on the link and read a few answers, didn't you?
Here's an example.
It is not the case that there exists positive integers x, y, z, n such that ( n>2 and x^n + y^n = z^n ).
Ever heard of Andrew Wiles?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
86 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Let me begin by stating that it is not my intent to limit or prohibit anyone's privilege to [View all]
Atticus
Mar 2022
OP
My belief is that all have a right to express their faith whether in a diety or
overleft
Mar 2022
#2
And you make the same error other atheists have. Proselytization is the urging or encouraging
Atticus
Mar 2022
#6
Except that I know anti-theists and non-religious who believe the most outrageous things.
shrike3
Mar 2022
#41
"---atheists don't need to ask it." So, it never occurs to atheists to ask the "What is the
Atticus
Mar 2022
#43
I would normally respond with "Bless your heart!" but, I assume you don't believe in
Atticus
Mar 2022
#65
However you choose to describe it, you choose to believe something which cannot be
Atticus
Mar 2022
#10
Again, the other side of the coin: there exists no proof of the non-existence of God. nt
Atticus
Mar 2022
#17
It certainly is an alternative belief. Is your problem with the "system" part? nt
Atticus
Mar 2022
#11
As said before, you are certainly free to believe or "not believe" as you think best. At least,
Atticus
Mar 2022
#33
Who said non-belief was the "equivalent" of belief? Are the terms not simply the
Atticus
Mar 2022
#57
I have seldom enjoyed reading and thinking about a post as much as I enjoyed yours.
Atticus
Mar 2022
#34
Unlike some here, I have not stated my belief or lack of belief. That is a personal decision
Atticus
Mar 2022
#31