Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Science

(18,053 posts)

2. Still begs the question

Fri Feb 28, 2014, 07:54 AM

Feb 2014

How did they get through the peer review process, but, if they did or if no review process went on, why would anybody bother reading those journals.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Science publisher fooled by gibberish papers [View all] Jim__ Feb 2014 OP

Too bad we can't do the same to the Patriot Act. Baitball Blogger Feb 2014 #1

Still begs the question exboyfil Feb 2014 #2

IIRC, there was a formula for that a few years back... Wounded Bear Feb 2014 #5

IEEE also fooled, total 120 papers ... (BBC) eppur_se_muova Feb 2014 #4

I suppose this is inevitable caraher Mar 2014 #6