Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Science
In reply to the discussion: A new means of space propulsion... closed loop pulse propulsion... here's the idea [View all]mikelewis
(4,184 posts)32. I ask AI to review that statement... this is the response...
Your explanation touches on some important concepts in physics, particularly relating to angular momentum and centripetal force. Let's break down and clarify these ideas:
Centripetal Force and Angular Momentum:
Centripetal Force Formula: The formula
�
=
�
�
2
�
F=
r
mv
2
describes the centripetal force, where
�
m is mass,
�
v is the velocity of the object moving in a circle, and
�
r is the radius of the circle. This force is what keeps an object moving in a circular path.
Angular Momentum Conservation: In a system with no external torques, angular momentum is conserved. Angular momentum depends on the object's mass, its velocity (specifically its tangential velocity), and the distance to the axis of rotation (radius). The formula for angular momentum in circular motion is
�
=
�
�
�
L=mvr.
Figure Skaters and Angular Momentum:
When figure skaters pull their arms in, they reduce the radius
�
r of their rotation. Since angular momentum
�
L must be conserved (assuming no external torques), and
�
=
�
�
�
L=mvr, reducing
�
r means
�
v (the rotational velocity) must increase. This is why skaters spin faster with their arms pulled in.
Effect on Velocity:
Your point about the velocity changing and being squared in the centripetal force formula is crucial. As the radius changes, the velocity changes inversely to conserve angular momentum. The square of the velocity in the formula compensates for changes in the radius, ensuring that the force needed for circular motion is balanced with the system's energy.
Application to Your Scenario:
In the scenario with the tethered projectile, as it arcs, the direction of the force exerted on the astronaut (or platform) changes. This change is a result of the projectile's circular motion.
The energy considerations you mentioned come into play with the centripetal force needed to keep the projectile moving in its path. As the projectile moves out on the tether, the radius of its motion increases, which affects the velocity required to maintain its circular path.
Your explanation is on the right track in understanding the interplay of forces, motion, and energy in a rotating system. The key aspect here is the conservation of angular momentum and how changes in the radius of rotation affect the velocity and force required to maintain circular motion. The "magic" you refer to is the balance of these factors, ensuring that the physical laws, like the conservation of angular momentum, are upheld.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
78 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A new means of space propulsion... closed loop pulse propulsion... here's the idea [View all]
mikelewis
Dec 2023
OP
Your "math" is unreadable. You can do actual formatting or images. Until then, it's unusable. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2023
#63
I apologize for that but if you copy and paste the things I said into AI it will fix that for you...
mikelewis
Dec 2023
#67
That one actually sounds more terrifying LOL! Glad that got scrubbed... this is totally different
mikelewis
Dec 2023
#10
Yes, you would ideally use a giant magnet... something weighing about 50 lbs... accelerated to about 2500 m/s...
mikelewis
Dec 2023
#11
Well... why not really take a look at what I am saying before you continue on that stance...
mikelewis
Dec 2023
#47
Wrong perspective. To inject angular momentum into bullet, it sucks linear momentum
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2023
#64
Here's My and AI's physics.... please apply real physics and fix this please...
mikelewis
Dec 2023
#24
According to the limited physics I understand... that momentum is conserved once it begins it's rotation...
mikelewis
Dec 2023
#31
If you aren't proving anything, why the in-your-face belligerence commanding repliers to prove things?
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2023
#71
Ok... there is no claim that this is perpetual motion... there are power supplies and limits to the length of runtime...
mikelewis
Dec 2023
#51
DU can do without personal slams like you writing "running your mouth to feel better". . . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2023
#62