Science
In reply to the discussion: A new means of space propulsion... closed loop pulse propulsion... here's the idea [View all]mikelewis
(4,184 posts)You're just saying things. Make 0 = 0 and you win.
And to speak more to your outlandish accusations. I never once claimed this was perpetual motion. In every setup there is a power source of some kind and a limit to that. Now if you find it difficult that I can leverage more out of a system than you can... perhaps your grasp on physics isn't as great as you believe. However, I argue figure skaters pull this maneuver off all the time. You are welcome to just sit in the cheap seats and shit all over this without stepping up and proving anything you are saying.. especially since some of the things were ridiculously wrong.
I have presented you with math. Math, that as one well versed in physics that should be straight forward and simple to understand. You don't even have to do it... you just have to fix it. Just take the math I provided and make it equal zero. However, you do have to account for the force vectors... you can't just say 1 - 1 = 0. Pretty sure everyone knows that already... please assume I at least know the basics and I'm not stupid enough to wade into this arena with some weak ass nonsense. So either put up or shut up.