Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Stallion

(6,613 posts)

5. There is a 0% of Getting Single Payor in Forseeable Future

Reply to JDPriestly (Reply #4)

Sun Feb 21, 2016, 11:36 PM

Feb 2016

only shot is to win the 2016, 2018 and 2020 elections big on both federal and state levels so we can pass through massive redistricting in 2020 so Democratic power is not diluted. I don't care to deal with a mystical fantasy world

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Poll: Where do you stand on single payer. [View all] JDPriestly Feb 2016 OP

If we could go back 50 years or look ahead 25, I'd be in single payer camp. Hoyt Feb 2016 #1

I think either of the first two options is great. Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #2

Indeed. How could she honestly be against that? think Feb 2016 #7

What I Want and What a Democrat Can Deliver are Two Different Things Stallion Feb 2016 #3

Have you ever seen something happen in your life that you thought was impossible? JDPriestly Feb 2016 #4

There is a 0% of Getting Single Payor in Forseeable Future Stallion Feb 2016 #5

I really think a public option is doable, as long as people have a choice. Hoyt Feb 2016 #8

There are public health reasons for it nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #6

I'd prefer single payer Matariki Feb 2016 #9

What exactly does "single-payer" mean. Everything, including prescriptions, nursing home, long term Jitter65 Feb 2016 #10

I lived in Europe for years. JDPriestly Feb 2016 #11