Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Shame on anyone who finds this acceptable in a politician [View all]jtuck004
(15,882 posts)134. Doubt it. Hearts don't change. n/t
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
277 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think you are close. She's going to show him she was the better one all along.
thereismore
Mar 2016
#139
I agree with everything you said. And that's been true of a lot of these rich Feminists. They TALK
sabrina 1
Mar 2016
#268
DeGreg speaks for me. Hillary's foreign policy stances and corporate connections are all Republican
CoffeeCat
Mar 2016
#188
Ya know, I'd like to hear her speak also. But I can't afford the $225,000 cover charge...
Raster
Mar 2016
#49
Yeah, the Goldman Sachs Group and the Keystone Pipeline people can't get enough of what she says.
Hassin Bin Sober
Mar 2016
#81
I didn't understand why she was going all around the country up here speaking on
polly7
Mar 2016
#101
While you're getting out in front to defend her, she's picking your back pockets. n/t
ebayfool
Mar 2016
#197
If she wanted to make things better, she wouldn't be supporting fracking and calling the TPP the
Cavallo
Mar 2016
#248
You brought up Karl Rove...it often seems like he is running Hillary's campaign.
Punkingal
Mar 2016
#8
But she wants back into office in the worst way. Did you notice she's trying to be President? Not
Gene Debs
Mar 2016
#23
You really think that those donators did not think she would run for President.
bkkyosemite
Mar 2016
#35
Did you get those ideas from the, "I'm totally lost on what elected officials do for a living"?
MrMickeysMom
Mar 2016
#47
How much did they pay Jimmy Carter to speak while he was helping to build homes? n/t
jtuck004
Mar 2016
#138
But, but, Janey, this is an open forum and anything Hillary-neutral is strictly "verboten".
Surya Gayatri
Mar 2016
#10
Re the Foundation and some of the weapons being used to commit war crimes in Yemen.
polly7
Mar 2016
#126
you can read up on the foundation's good works here...https://www.clintonfoundation.org/
yawnmaster
Mar 2016
#119
thanks so she worked cheap for her son-in-laws employer-wonder what else she'll do for them
azurnoir
Mar 2016
#25
She amassed about $50 million dollars in 15 years. Her priorities aren't with the 99%. nm
rhett o rick
Mar 2016
#221
Not so good. I see the government in the hands of Big Money and some so-called Democrats
rhett o rick
Mar 2016
#229
It buys influence...she was for it and then against it and will be for it again.
bkkyosemite
Mar 2016
#38
She's not being paid to speak. She's doing the speaking for free. The money is for favors later on.
Gene Debs
Mar 2016
#27
Yeah ............ pretty much - and absolutely dispute she's one of the most respected. nt.
polly7
Mar 2016
#57
It's great that she did so well.. but she should now be barred from public service
basselope
Mar 2016
#16
Hillary Clinton will still win the Democratic nomination and be elected President.
George II
Mar 2016
#21
It would be fine if she was not going to run for the highest office in the world...not fine
bkkyosemite
Mar 2016
#64
Hum...there IS this. Have a look, unless it would clash with your mindset:
Surya Gayatri
Mar 2016
#82
She was not holding a public or appointed office at the time of these speeches. I see no issue here.
LonePirate
Mar 2016
#61
And you do not think they knew she was going to run for President when they
bkkyosemite
Mar 2016
#67
hmm...I don't see any unions, or teachers' organizations, or environmental groups on this list...
KansDem
Mar 2016
#68
Their foundation is highly efficient with only 11% overhead, and has provided $2,000 million dollars
PeaceNikki
Mar 2016
#84
Not some. 26 times as much as she made on her three Goldman Sachs speeches combined
PeaceNikki
Mar 2016
#91
The money comes with strings. Quid pro quo. Goldman-Sachs see it as an "investment
rhett o rick
Mar 2016
#212
I know, just look at all of the stuff Larry the Cable Guy and Gaga did for them in return.
PeaceNikki
Mar 2016
#215
Those that side with the Big Money feel glib that their candidate has the Big Money
rhett o rick
Mar 2016
#231
That list doesn't seem to show a lot of Hillary paying 'attention to African American concerns'
FailureToCommunicate
Mar 2016
#75
She knew she was going to run for president. To think otherwise isn't even realistic. nt.
polly7
Mar 2016
#86
Ed Schultz actually defended this yesterday even though he supports Bernie
BernieforPres2016
Mar 2016
#156
what could she possibly have to say in a "speech" that was worth a quarter million dollars an hour??
BREMPRO
Mar 2016
#162
"American Camping Association", "Let's Talk Entertainment", "Cardiovascular Research Foundation"
Yavin4
Mar 2016
#163
Absolutely! Then she'll be able to use the powers and perks of her elected office...
Raster
Mar 2016
#196
And of course all of these little "chats" were just chocked full of Hillarian anecdotes....
Raster
Mar 2016
#194
Kicked and recommended! This should receive hundreds of recommendations. nt
Enthusiast
Mar 2016
#203
It's possible that a way to give money to candidates is call it a fee for speaking. Just saying.
Cavallo
Mar 2016
#245
$250k per hour is fine for Hill and Bill. $600k per year is fine for Chelsea.
Skeeter Barnes
Mar 2016
#261