2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Shame on anyone who finds this acceptable in a politician [View all]CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)The reason that Obama beat Hillary in 2008, was because our party preferred a candidate who represented the base of the Democratic party. Obama was against the Iraq war and that fueled much of Obama's popularity.
Hillary on the other hand, was endorsed two weeks ago, by Robert Kagan, the founder of the neocon movement. Kagan was also one of her foreign-policy advisors. The neocons used to be a stain that was limited to the Republican party. Now, Hillary not only hand picks the neocon founder as one of her adviser--he endorses Hillary for President over any Republican candidate.
This is disturbing to many lifelong Democrats, including myself.
And that long list of $225,000+ speeches she gave to powerful corporate interests, speaks volumes. Money should not be corrupting our democracy in this way. Democrats were always the party that leveraged the little guy while the Republicans were off kow towing to powerful corporations.
That list of speeches is a list of her buyers. Hillary Clinton is owned..
This is the reason that Bernie out-raised Clinton in February. This is expected behavior from the Republicans, and many find it very unwelcome in our own Democratic party.