Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: The bashing of the Progressives (my own last post here in GDP) [View all]mrdmk
(2,943 posts)242. Thank-you for proving the OP's point, on ignore
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
273 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yeah, no one's going to have enough pledged delegates going into the convention
Art_from_Ark
Apr 2016
#4
Yes, but the primary is not the ballgame, either--unless the supporters of Sanders make it so.
merrily
Apr 2016
#7
The last time the Clintons took over the party progressives went to the wilderness for 2 decades
pengu
Apr 2016
#79
Increasing popular rage, due to economic oppression, is inevitable. Thus revolution is inevitable.
Admiral Loinpresser
Apr 2016
#96
That would ensure they win, in every way that matters. Why let them run you off? We have more
haikugal
Apr 2016
#203
The groundwork has been laid for any opposition during her term to be labeled, "misogynist" nt
Snotcicles
Apr 2016
#153
I hear ya, and you're right. The struggle for many of us, is that' we've always been Democrats
2banon
Apr 2016
#235
Sorry you feel that way. Some here believe we will make more actual progress with another candidate.
Hoyt
Apr 2016
#2
Someone from Colorado says this?? Do you have a clue what insurance companies--
eridani
Apr 2016
#14
The choice and more options gambit didn't work in 2009 when we could have used it
eridani
Apr 2016
#28
I know that's how it started in Canada and I had hoped hit would start that way here too
Nanjeanne
May 2016
#270
According to a poll yesterday with lots of responses, DU is still 80-85% Bernie supporters.
leveymg
Apr 2016
#107
It should be a very ineresting convention. Thanks for saying it so well. Bernie isn't done...
snowy owl
Apr 2016
#6
She's going to have a very rough time of it in the 2016 GE, especially with Charles Koch
RKP5637
Apr 2016
#63
Soft corruption is perfectly legal in case you weren't aware. So no I didn't say convict her.
think
Apr 2016
#139
I can and will make both points. Hillary is corrupt and her supporters are using right wing memes
think
Apr 2016
#160
Did Hillary take millions from the banks that broke laws or not? Can you answer that simple question
think
Apr 2016
#171
That question is irrelevant to the point I am making about your blatant hypocrisy.
LonePirate
Apr 2016
#172
Hillary took millions from the banks that routinely violate laws. Hillary supports policy that the
think
Apr 2016
#177
I read the entire sub-thread and I think it's you who has the reading comprehension problem.
ChisolmTrailDem
Apr 2016
#231
Sander supporters DESPISE HILLARY only bc she has a DOCUMENTED HISTORY of Corruption, PERIOD
quantass
Apr 2016
#120
LOL. Trying to revise history. Progressive have been bashed here over and over.
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#219
Not only the general idea, but Medicare for All, clean elections, etc. Good grief.
merrily
Apr 2016
#30
Poster, please. Your reply 34 was to my post 30, which said nothing about those things.
merrily
Apr 2016
#49
This would be an example. The audacity to define Democrats in this manner and expect anything.
seabeyond
Apr 2016
#69
The political environment in the US today is akin to a Jerry Springer show. n/t
RKP5637
Apr 2016
#70
If the democrats don't stop ripping each other apart and cementing hard feelings, that is
RKP5637
Apr 2016
#80
Yes, worst, if the R's had the chance to nominate and install likely the next 3 on
RKP5637
Apr 2016
#76
You're right - the Hillary partisans ARE horrible for using racial politics to divide Democrats.
Maedhros
Apr 2016
#191
Let's see where those "younger, more progressive Americans" are during the mid-term elections.
Fla Dem
Apr 2016
#126
"You are clearly on the wrong side of the trajectory of this party and this country."
vintx
Apr 2016
#133
They were sold the label that said "Pragmatist (TM) and they didn't realize it was Kool-Aid. nt
Bonobo
Apr 2016
#85
Exactly my assessment. These people are more afraid of being thought fools... for believing in the
JudyM
Apr 2016
#176
Exactly! I just went through my Transparency page again to look at the alert stalking.
R B Garr
Apr 2016
#122
Actually the real problem is a number of people were under the mistaken impression
cstanleytech
Apr 2016
#187
So pardon me if your warnings about karma fall on deaf ears. Karma is what you're seeing now
Haveadream
Apr 2016
#189
Yep. When you have alleged Democrats on DU arguing that we can't afford Medicare for All ...
Scuba
Apr 2016
#62
I, and others, predict an exodus from the party the day after HRH is nominated.
DirtyHippyBastard
Apr 2016
#210
Happy travels, friend. And you are absolutely right. It wasn't just Sanders who lost. It was the
Doctor_J
Apr 2016
#83
You lament 'bashing of Progressives' then proceed to bash Progressives who disagree with you.
randome
Apr 2016
#89
As certified by the Bonobo label. You don't decide these things for us. The voters have.
randome
Apr 2016
#95
they also rail against "authoritarianism" while keeping lists and "naming people" as neo cons and
bettyellen
Apr 2016
#212
Are you denying Hillary's neocon foreign policy?Are you denying her Goldman sachs and other bank
think
Apr 2016
#100
Ridiculous, right? Further a couple of the votes they disagreed, she was MORE progressive than
seabeyond
Apr 2016
#143
Be ready to stand with others if the political revolution evolves to reforming the election and
stillwaiting
Apr 2016
#106
Holding one's nose to support a compromised candIdate induces cognitive dissonance.
Orsino
Apr 2016
#128
What do people expect when supporters of one candidate vociferously attack the other candidate?
LonePirate
Apr 2016
#130
HRC still needs 70% of the remaining delegates to get the nomination; it's not at all clear she can
amborin
Apr 2016
#148
Hate to burst your bubble JT but I believe he means his last post in GDP (though it wasn't), not his
seaglass
Apr 2016
#170
Yea, you are so progressive that you think women should forget about breaking that
JTFrog
Apr 2016
#257
There are a few moderate/centrists "bashers" of progressive ideas, however
forjusticethunders
Apr 2016
#159
Clinton will now have to rely on "lesser of two evils", "not as bad", marketing of her product.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Apr 2016
#164
A hell of a branding statement, "I'm better than the next choice, so deal with it"
mrdmk
Apr 2016
#249
I personally think Karma is bullshit and mostly invoked as a passive aggressive vindication
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#223
Wow... wish I said that! It never ceases to amaze me that people on this board can actually
BigBearJohn
Apr 2016
#253