Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)USA TODAY: Secretary without honor [View all]
Secretary without honorPhillip Jennings 6:46 p.m. EDT June 5, 2016
When I hear people say Clinton emails don't matter, I remember a young Marine captain who owned up to his career-ruining mistake.
Apologists for Hillary Clintons alleged criminal mishandling of classified documents say that it doesnt matter, that she really did nothing wrong, or nothing significant. But the real question is not so much what she did as how she has responded to being found out.
Once during the mid-1960s when I was on active duty in the Marine Corps, I was the air liaison officer for a battalion of Marines aboard 11 ships in the Mediterranean. As the air officer and a senior captain, I had a rotating responsibility for the nuclear code book, kept in the safe in the operations room of the lead amphibious squadron command ship. I shared that duty with another captain, a squared away young man, liked by all he commanded and the son of a very high-ranking Marine.
On the day our ships were leaving the Mediterranean, we met the new amphibious squadron near Gibraltar and made preparations to transfer security codes and other sensitive material to the incoming Marine battalion. The young captain was on duty and went to the operations office to pick up the code book. He was alone in the office. He removed the code book and placed it on the desk while closing the safe. In a rushed moment, he stepped across the passageway to retrieve something he needed from his quarters. Seconds later, he stepped back into the operations office and found the operations sergeant having just entered, looking down at the code book.
Against all regulations, the code book had been out of the safe and unattended. It mattered not that it was unattended for only seconds, that the ship was 5 miles at sea, or that it was certain no one unauthorized had seen the code. The captain could have explained this to the operations sergeant. He could have told the sergeant that he would take care of it. He could have hinted that his high-ranking dad could smooth it over.
But the Marine Corps values are honor, courage and commitment. Honor is the bedrock of our character. The young captain could not ask the sergeant to betray his duty to report the infraction, no matter how small. Instead, the captain simply said, Lets go see the colonel...
SNIP (Please read the article to find out what happened to the young officer. I must edit it for fair use.)
...Clinton is the antithesis of that young captain, someone with no honor, little courage and commitment only to her endless ambition. This has nothing to do with gender, party affiliation, ideology or policy. It is a question of character not just hers, but ours. Electing Clinton would mean abandoning holding people accountable for grievous errors of integrity and responsibility. What we already know about her security infractions should disqualify her for any government position that deals in information critical to mission success, domestic or foreign. But beyond that, her responses to being found out dismissing its importance, claiming ignorance, blaming others indict her beyond anything the investigation can reveal. Those elements reveal her character. And the saddest thing is that so many in America seem not to care.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2016/06/05/hillary-clinton-email-scandal-consequences-integrity-honesty-column/85205018/
104 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So you like promoting pig Republican warmongers who say Vietnam was a success in defeating Communism
Dem2
Jun 2016
#25
You know you're not thinking when you take 2 seconds to defend using right-wing gutter warmongers
Dem2
Jun 2016
#31
Its Odd that a Democratic Party would vote for a war monger , Clintons changed that too.
bahrbearian
Jun 2016
#97
if you are not able to recognize an opinion piece, you've got a serious intellectual disability.
Bill USA
Jun 2016
#94
Yes, because no one else has issues with Hillary's irresponsible email mess except right wingers. nt
Logical
Jun 2016
#98
if you will notice, the url you put in OP shows the article is in the OPINION section of the paper.
Bill USA
Jun 2016
#99
Even a bigger coincidence! Hillary voted for the Patriot Act that Bush created!
pinebox
Jun 2016
#79
It's always interesting watching the commentary of Team Hill to these types of things
Hydra
Jun 2016
#14
It seems it mattered to Hillary in 2007. Source: herself. Allowed after June14?
floppyboo
Jun 2016
#44
Major WINGNUT alert!! This guy is pro-war - how in god's name can you use sources like this?
Dem2
Jun 2016
#18
Sure, leaving the nuclear codes applicable to the entire theatres arsenal is equivalent to
stevenleser
Jun 2016
#24
Well, then it's on you to show how the nuclear codes and Hillary's emails are the same
stevenleser
Jun 2016
#39
Her Majesty signed an SF312. She swore to protect classified information just like the military.
BillZBubb
Jun 2016
#42
I've told you this several times now. At this point you are stalking me. I am not a contributor
stevenleser
Jun 2016
#83
No because I'm tired of bullshit outrage about stuff all politicians do to advance their careers
kimbutgar
Jun 2016
#37
Exactly, cultists can't stand the truth, it is to be mocked, dismissed, disparaged and ignored.
BillZBubb
Jun 2016
#40
They outright deny the truth. It's astonishing they fancy themselves progressives...
JudyM
Jun 2016
#45
If you are a Bernie supporter, why does your profile say your favorite group is "Hillary Clinton".
FourScore
Jun 2016
#47
They all lie just like their leader. They say whatever they think you should hear.
pdsimdars
Jun 2016
#70
Excellent OP. Clinton cannot place any principle or authority above her own ambition.
senz
Jun 2016
#49
I do not want Trump to be President, but I hate to say that I agree with this. And what is worse, so
highprincipleswork
Jun 2016
#52
We've already seen important talking heads refuse to twist logic to help Clinton
Babel_17
Jun 2016
#72