Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: USA TODAY: Secretary without honor [View all]kimbutgar
(23,791 posts)37. No because I'm tired of bullshit outrage about stuff all politicians do to advance their careers
My outrage meter has developed to the point I can detect bullshit propaganda stories.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
104 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So you like promoting pig Republican warmongers who say Vietnam was a success in defeating Communism
Dem2
Jun 2016
#25
You know you're not thinking when you take 2 seconds to defend using right-wing gutter warmongers
Dem2
Jun 2016
#31
Its Odd that a Democratic Party would vote for a war monger , Clintons changed that too.
bahrbearian
Jun 2016
#97
if you are not able to recognize an opinion piece, you've got a serious intellectual disability.
Bill USA
Jun 2016
#94
Yes, because no one else has issues with Hillary's irresponsible email mess except right wingers. nt
Logical
Jun 2016
#98
if you will notice, the url you put in OP shows the article is in the OPINION section of the paper.
Bill USA
Jun 2016
#99
Even a bigger coincidence! Hillary voted for the Patriot Act that Bush created!
pinebox
Jun 2016
#79
It's always interesting watching the commentary of Team Hill to these types of things
Hydra
Jun 2016
#14
It seems it mattered to Hillary in 2007. Source: herself. Allowed after June14?
floppyboo
Jun 2016
#44
Major WINGNUT alert!! This guy is pro-war - how in god's name can you use sources like this?
Dem2
Jun 2016
#18
Sure, leaving the nuclear codes applicable to the entire theatres arsenal is equivalent to
stevenleser
Jun 2016
#24
Well, then it's on you to show how the nuclear codes and Hillary's emails are the same
stevenleser
Jun 2016
#39
Her Majesty signed an SF312. She swore to protect classified information just like the military.
BillZBubb
Jun 2016
#42
I've told you this several times now. At this point you are stalking me. I am not a contributor
stevenleser
Jun 2016
#83
No because I'm tired of bullshit outrage about stuff all politicians do to advance their careers
kimbutgar
Jun 2016
#37
Exactly, cultists can't stand the truth, it is to be mocked, dismissed, disparaged and ignored.
BillZBubb
Jun 2016
#40
They outright deny the truth. It's astonishing they fancy themselves progressives...
JudyM
Jun 2016
#45
If you are a Bernie supporter, why does your profile say your favorite group is "Hillary Clinton".
FourScore
Jun 2016
#47
They all lie just like their leader. They say whatever they think you should hear.
pdsimdars
Jun 2016
#70
Excellent OP. Clinton cannot place any principle or authority above her own ambition.
senz
Jun 2016
#49
I do not want Trump to be President, but I hate to say that I agree with this. And what is worse, so
highprincipleswork
Jun 2016
#52
We've already seen important talking heads refuse to twist logic to help Clinton
Babel_17
Jun 2016
#72