Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: USA TODAY: Secretary without honor [View all]BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)42. Her Majesty signed an SF312. She swore to protect classified information just like the military.
Even more so because in her position she was an originator of classified information.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
104 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So you like promoting pig Republican warmongers who say Vietnam was a success in defeating Communism
Dem2
Jun 2016
#25
You know you're not thinking when you take 2 seconds to defend using right-wing gutter warmongers
Dem2
Jun 2016
#31
Its Odd that a Democratic Party would vote for a war monger , Clintons changed that too.
bahrbearian
Jun 2016
#97
if you are not able to recognize an opinion piece, you've got a serious intellectual disability.
Bill USA
Jun 2016
#94
Yes, because no one else has issues with Hillary's irresponsible email mess except right wingers. nt
Logical
Jun 2016
#98
if you will notice, the url you put in OP shows the article is in the OPINION section of the paper.
Bill USA
Jun 2016
#99
Even a bigger coincidence! Hillary voted for the Patriot Act that Bush created!
pinebox
Jun 2016
#79
It's always interesting watching the commentary of Team Hill to these types of things
Hydra
Jun 2016
#14
It seems it mattered to Hillary in 2007. Source: herself. Allowed after June14?
floppyboo
Jun 2016
#44
Major WINGNUT alert!! This guy is pro-war - how in god's name can you use sources like this?
Dem2
Jun 2016
#18
Sure, leaving the nuclear codes applicable to the entire theatres arsenal is equivalent to
stevenleser
Jun 2016
#24
Well, then it's on you to show how the nuclear codes and Hillary's emails are the same
stevenleser
Jun 2016
#39
Her Majesty signed an SF312. She swore to protect classified information just like the military.
BillZBubb
Jun 2016
#42
I've told you this several times now. At this point you are stalking me. I am not a contributor
stevenleser
Jun 2016
#83
No because I'm tired of bullshit outrage about stuff all politicians do to advance their careers
kimbutgar
Jun 2016
#37
Exactly, cultists can't stand the truth, it is to be mocked, dismissed, disparaged and ignored.
BillZBubb
Jun 2016
#40
They outright deny the truth. It's astonishing they fancy themselves progressives...
JudyM
Jun 2016
#45
If you are a Bernie supporter, why does your profile say your favorite group is "Hillary Clinton".
FourScore
Jun 2016
#47
They all lie just like their leader. They say whatever they think you should hear.
pdsimdars
Jun 2016
#70
Excellent OP. Clinton cannot place any principle or authority above her own ambition.
senz
Jun 2016
#49
I do not want Trump to be President, but I hate to say that I agree with this. And what is worse, so
highprincipleswork
Jun 2016
#52
We've already seen important talking heads refuse to twist logic to help Clinton
Babel_17
Jun 2016
#72