Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
106. Spoken like a true ultra conservative
Wed Nov 23, 2016, 01:38 PM
Nov 2016

Last edited Wed Nov 23, 2016, 02:10 PM - Edit history (1)

When are you folks going to realize that you are not a majority in the Democratic Party. Note that in almost every primary (and their were more than 50 of them) that the majority of Democratic Party members voted for Hilary - who you refer to as a "third way" candidate.

In addition your group makes up a small percentage of the American voting population, maybe 10% or 15%. (It is a very loud, active and enthusiastic 10% to 15%, but it is still as a small share of the votes.) When either of the two major parties nominate candidates from their fringes, their chances of winning the White House are diminished because Americans are primarily center left or center right in their orientation.

So, the ultra left have three choices:

You can form your own political party I'm sure you can get the tiny groups of Greens and Socialists to join you. But be aware - if you do so you will marginalize yourself to the sidelines and will likely ensure that Republicans will permanently occupy the White House.

You can continue to be unreliable allies of the Democratic Party: In other words you can continue to act exactly like you have been acting - running candidates who will likely lose in the primaries or very likely will lose in the general election if they get that far. You also continue to act like like you have when a more center oriented progressive wins the Democratic nomination - either unenthusiastically supporting him/her, holding your nose and voting for him/her, not voting (your conscious, etc.), or voting 3rd party.

You can join with the rest of your progressive brethren in an strong coalition which is likely to win by also appealing to the independent centralists who decide most Presidential elections: The fastest growing demographics are on our side - blacks, Hispanics, unmarried women, and the young. If we stick together it will grow ever more and more difficult over time for Republicans to win the White House unless they totally disavow many of their current policies.

This was an an exceeding odd and strange election. Trump had populist message which also appealed to the worst elements of our society, but he is in for a very rocky road as he tries to govern. He will be revealed as the con man, the charlatan that he really is. His lying will catch up with him and, for various reasons, he will be unable carry through on many of the promises he made. And he won't have the excuse of having opposition Congress. He is already backing away from some of his more impossible commitments and he hasn't even taken the oath of office yet. Trump is destined to give populism a bad name.

However, Trump has already made it all but impossible for the Republicans to take the difficult steps to deal with the demographic changes which will become more and more difficult to ignore. They need to soften or even reverse their stances on immigration, abortion and law and order but with the nomination and election of Trump, he has made those tasks impossible for the time being.

In 2020, I believe that the country will be ripe for a change and together we can take advantage of that, but only if we stick together. However, if the ultra left chooses again to go its own way, we may have to endure Republicans in control of the White House, the Congress and the Supreme Court for sometime to come.

Excellent analysis radical noodle Nov 2016 #1
I obviously haven't given this as much thought as you have... CaliforniaPeggy Nov 2016 #2
There were others running against her too JonLP24 Nov 2016 #3
He was 74 and had a lifetime to contemplate R B Garr Nov 2016 #29
plus infinity JTFrog Nov 2016 #30
plus 1000! DemonGoddess Nov 2016 #48
I think after 8 years under Obama JonLP24 Nov 2016 #62
Wrong, he couldn't name one person he would prosecute regarding Wall Street, so R B Garr Nov 2016 #67
If you paid attention to his career JonLP24 Nov 2016 #70
Bernie Sanders originally was all about pushing Hillary to the left, period. CajunBlazer Nov 2016 #71
Like I said at the time when he was JonLP24 Nov 2016 #72
Sanders was a leading progressive voice - who never got anything done CajunBlazer Nov 2016 #73
"the only state with two Senators and only one Representative. " Wabbajack_ Nov 2016 #109
You're right - my bad! CajunBlazer Nov 2016 #113
The Senate has got to be Wabbajack_ Nov 2016 #114
You will have to blame the founding fathers for that one CajunBlazer Nov 2016 #115
In the case of the Senate Wabbajack_ Nov 2016 #121
Wow, I didn't know about that one. Thanks CajunBlazer Dec 2016 #122
What smears? He campaigned on Ideas, he never attacked her personally. jg10003 Nov 2016 #82
Here the tell... stevebreeze Nov 2016 #55
You're absolutely right CajunBlazer Nov 2016 #56
Agree. but also yes and stevebreeze Nov 2016 #60
The problem with just adopting Bernie's platform... Blanks Nov 2016 #76
I can't exactly remember the timeline JonLP24 Nov 2016 #61
Some analyst predicted Trump would win because he wasn't the incumbent party LeftInTX Nov 2016 #4
The bad economy is a bit of a myth. Unemployment in battleground states: ucrdem Nov 2016 #5
1, thank you the UE rate in those stats are past full employment and now DPurtin says uponit7771 Nov 2016 #14
Do you think that those who went without full time jobs for years or.... CajunBlazer Nov 2016 #58
The electoral college treestar Nov 2016 #6
this Freddie Nov 2016 #27
Lots of MSM mythology here too. No mention of fiddling the vote in any way, though. Ford_Prefect Nov 2016 #7
Post removed Post removed Nov 2016 #8
Lol, all they have is Bernie Duckhunter935 Nov 2016 #10
Are you aware that she is almost two million votes ahead of trump? lunamagica Nov 2016 #35
Yep, and she lost Duckhunter935 Nov 2016 #40
No she didn't. Every day it becomes more and more clear that she won and lunamagica Nov 2016 #41
Funny, that's Trump's line Duckhunter935 Nov 2016 #42
Oh, come on don't be like that. The election was stolen. Is that better? Do you approve? lunamagica Nov 2016 #43
the GOP and media would have killed Sanders Fast Walker 52 Nov 2016 #11
No dont think so because Bernie Sanders had a huge Majority of the INdemo Nov 2016 #25
Lol. Those have to be the rosiest color glasses I've ever seen. JTFrog Nov 2016 #34
the millenial/youth vote is never something solid to base a presidential campaign on Fast Walker 52 Nov 2016 #37
1. JudyM Nov 2016 #97
They can't accept that Bernie would have flamed out R B Garr Nov 2016 #31
he would have been attacked mercilessly on that Fast Walker 52 Nov 2016 #36
No question Bernie would've landslided Nazi-Don the Con...as we shall see in 4 years!! InAbLuEsTaTe Nov 2016 #13
No. Sorry but the truth hurts. JTFrog Nov 2016 #33
Looking at this in relation to tRump, who would've been his opponent, it wouldn't work mattered. JudyM Nov 2016 #98
Lol, ok. nt JTFrog Nov 2016 #103
All this is very true. I would just add: "voter suppression." pnwmom Nov 2016 #9
Beat me to it... should be the #1 reason!! Need an investigation into this NOW by Executive Order while Obama is still in office. InAbLuEsTaTe Nov 2016 #16
I'd like to see the Prez do more to oppose the RW takeover while he's still Prez. Ligyron Nov 2016 #24
1 Martin Eden Nov 2016 #17
#1 is a bullshit lie, 4.9% UE rate with rising LFPR and falling U6, the part time recovery is a myth uponit7771 Nov 2016 #12
Can't you disagree with someone without accusing them of lying? n/t pnwmom Nov 2016 #18
Oh, that's okay CajunBlazer Nov 2016 #26
You totally misinterpered the article CajunBlazer Nov 2016 #32
I think you're relieving Hillary of all blame and that isn't fair either. Vinca Nov 2016 #15
Hillary was up against an opponent who got free network coverage for everything he did. pnwmom Nov 2016 #20
Hillary wasn't nearly as good a campaigner as Obama or her husband was. mtnsnake Nov 2016 #19
Hillary had enough magnetism to get 1.7 million votes (and counting) more than DT. pnwmom Nov 2016 #21
She did, but look who she was running against. I think Elizabeth Warren would've clobbered trump. mtnsnake Nov 2016 #22
She was running against a super salesman. "Believe me," Bernie or anyone else would have pnwmom Nov 2016 #44
Excellent post. athena Nov 2016 #50
I think Joe Biden would have beaten Trump LeftInTX Nov 2016 #38
You are of course entitled to your opinion; you are are also entitled to be wrong CajunBlazer Nov 2016 #46
No Democrat running a campaign based on logic and reason pnwmom Nov 2016 #51
Agree CajunBlazer Nov 2016 #68
People were happy saying Clinton's campain was brilliant when Trump seemed to be in her dust Tom Rinaldo Nov 2016 #23
This message was self-deleted by its author CajunBlazer Nov 2016 #45
I would re-title #1 as "Wage Attrition" or re-write it as "Income Disparity." I take issue with #5. Auggie Nov 2016 #28
If by DemonGoddess Nov 2016 #49
It's not that, though I totally understand her need to be on guard Auggie Nov 2016 #52
I have come to the conclusion that Michael Moore was never a big Hillary fan CajunBlazer Nov 2016 #53
Authenticity is my suggestion and only one of several -- perhaps dozens -- of debatable reasons ... Auggie Nov 2016 #54
BTW, it was Moore who warned Trump could win. Auggie Nov 2016 #59
In the South we have a saying: CajunBlazer Nov 2016 #63
Most of the Trump supporters that I've encountered absolutely DO cite the economy. hamsterjill Nov 2016 #39
Disagree about #7 Retrograde Nov 2016 #47
I wouldn't waste my breath if I was you. VulgarPoet Nov 2016 #94
Good analysis! mcar Nov 2016 #57
Thanks, it took a while to get my thoughts together on this one CajunBlazer Nov 2016 #65
Good summary, I'm guessing most here don't find this collection unreasonable Dem2 Nov 2016 #64
The Goring/Swiftboating (choose your term) covered years. CBHagman Nov 2016 #66
Great post. I think that at least 60% goes to the amount of airtime he got underpants Nov 2016 #69
The candidate is blameless? zipplewrath Nov 2016 #74
I agree. potone Nov 2016 #78
And who started the "Hillary is trustworthy" attacks? CajunBlazer Nov 2016 #84
You can't hold him responsible for that. potone Nov 2016 #88
Hillary was considered 'untrustworthy' long before Sanders entered the race. Marr Nov 2016 #92
Nice try zipplewrath Nov 2016 #99
there is one reason that you left out: Corporate owned MSM played a crucial role of Bill USA Nov 2016 #75
She had too few campaign commercials talking about what she would do for America... dubyadiprecession Nov 2016 #77
The Democratic political demise was easily avoidable. It was our own party's fault. Oneironaut Nov 2016 #79
And who was a better candidate - Bernie Sanders??? CajunBlazer Nov 2016 #85
Who else ran? MicaelS Nov 2016 #93
Yes. What's so funny about losing? Oneironaut Nov 2016 #95
No, my problem is that the ultra liberals ..... CajunBlazer Nov 2016 #107
More viable zipplewrath Nov 2016 #100
Bernie was in it to win, and would have except for the Reid machine in NV. jg10003 Nov 2016 #80
BS! - How soon they forget CajunBlazer Nov 2016 #83
TOTALLY agree!!! nt Raine Nov 2016 #86
I kept saying she really needed to come out and talk about how she planned to fix Obamacare costs NoGoodNamesLeft Nov 2016 #81
Yep, I'm sure that would have turned everything around... CajunBlazer Nov 2016 #87
That would have made a difference with enough people to change the outcome NoGoodNamesLeft Nov 2016 #108
Okay, what plan would you have suggested that Hillary should have pushed? CajunBlazer Nov 2016 #111
Isn't that exactly what we thought? LisaL Nov 2016 #89
Post removed Post removed Nov 2016 #90
Bernie was the far stronger candidate in the general election. cpwm17 Nov 2016 #91
Oh jeez. LisaL Nov 2016 #96
Hillary was always close to Trump in the polls. cpwm17 Nov 2016 #105
On item #5, I know women who aren't prepared for a woman president. citood Nov 2016 #101
1 of 1. Same reason she lost the 2008 primary: she ignored too many states. ieoeja Nov 2016 #102
This. alarimer Nov 2016 #104
Spoken like a true ultra conservative CajunBlazer Nov 2016 #106
She failed ramapo Nov 2016 #110
Oh so you think Hillary was a bad candidate? CajunBlazer Nov 2016 #112
If you're being Honest you have to admit Hillary had major flaws quantumjunkie Nov 2016 #116
Yet another ultra liberal Bernie Supporter who was part of the problem CajunBlazer Nov 2016 #117
She lost the E.C. / JHan Nov 2016 #118
i think... djsunyc Nov 2016 #119
The economy is doing very well oberliner Nov 2016 #120
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Ten Reasons Why Hillary l...»Reply #106