2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hillary Lost Because ... [View all]Nevernose
(13,081 posts)That Clinton wasn't a great candidate for 2016 because of the decades of attacks on her. I've always been a fan of both Clintons, but I'm also aware of their reputation among a huge swath of voters, even among liberal voters.
Sanders might have won. Not because he was "better" than Clinton or even very different (they agreed on 95% of issues), but because he represented change and Hillary didn't. I've seen the opposition research against Bernie. The research on Trump was worse, but HE still got elected. We should have taken the thirty year hit job on Hillary as the major liability it was and not as a point of pride. That makes US feel better, but doesn't win elections.
I have no idea who we should run in 2020. My thinking is that we should concentrate on governor's mansions and state houses in 2018 to soften the worst impact of of Trump, and pray someone as charismatic as Obama is made clear (like when he ran in 2006 for senate and the whole country said "holy shit" .
And as crazy as it sounds: maybe we should ask Michael Moore. He's been right about everything so far. Which is weird, but I believe accurate.