Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

FBaggins

(27,724 posts)

1. Not likely

Reply to apcalc (Original post)

Mon Dec 5, 2016, 10:32 AM

Dec 2016

If it had been a seal of ballots (something protecting against tampering of ballots or "stuffing"of the box, that would be one thing... But a manufacturer's seal? That doesn't appear to be related to the vote.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Tip of a massive iceberg? [View all] apcalc Dec 2016 OP

Not likely FBaggins Dec 2016 #1

Broken seals on electronic voting machines raise questions of tampering magicarpet Dec 2016 #4

Only if they're seals related to the vote... not the warranty on the machine. FBaggins Dec 2016 #7

From Snopes FBaggins Dec 2016 #8

Thks! apcalc Dec 2016 #10

Break a security seal - then document entry to it as to who/why/wherefor - ....... magicarpet Dec 2016 #11

The problem with your claim is right there in the title FBaggins Dec 2016 #12

I feel like if we can just raise enough doubt... cilla4progress Dec 2016 #2

Not VOTER fraud - this is ELECTION fraud ...... magicarpet Dec 2016 #3

+1 uponit7771 Dec 2016 #5

THX for the edit APCALC - an important distinction (NT) magicarpet Dec 2016 #6

You bet! Realized right away! Thank you! apcalc Dec 2016 #9