Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

In reply to the discussion: Tip of a massive iceberg? [View all]

magicarpet

(16,545 posts)
4. Broken seals on electronic voting machines raise questions of tampering
Mon Dec 5, 2016, 11:53 AM
Dec 2016

~ Was a program inserted or the equipment re-programed to miscount the actual intended vote to favor a specific candidate ?

~ Were the internal workings tampered with to throw off the vote count total but untraceable ?

~ Were the tabulated votes adjusted or erased so the final vote count favors a specific candidate ?

A seal customarily indicates the machine has been tested, calibrated, and witnessed to work and function properly just before it is placed into service for an election. The seal assures the internal workings were not tampered with - a broken seal means someone accessed the internal workings of the electronic voting machine and signals a flashing red neon light that tampering with a free and fair election count was the intent of breaking the seal open.

Breaking and entering an electronic voting machine does not portend a free and fair election. The broken seal alerts you to that reality - or should.



Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Tip of a massive iceberg?»Reply #4