Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

In reply to the discussion: Tip of a massive iceberg? [View all]

FBaggins

(27,725 posts)
12. The problem with your claim is right there in the title
Mon Dec 5, 2016, 06:48 PM
Dec 2016

That isn't a security seal. Security seals have serial numbers on them so that they can be logged each time they're applied or broken.

It was right there in the text. "these are warranty seals used by technicians and should not be confused with “security seals” that the County would have used on Election Day."

Just as importantly, Stein's observers have been able to watch as ballots are counted by the machines in question and have seen no errors. The machine count matches the stack of ballots and both matched what was reported on election day.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Tip of a massive iceberg?»Reply #12