Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Exilednight

(9,359 posts)

29. No network actually covers th cost for producing one hour

Reply to spooky3 (Reply #26)

Fri Dec 9, 2016, 10:48 PM

Dec 2016

of news through the advertising of that one hour. It's a very nice expensive venture.

Yes, they do want high ratings, but want they want more is to retain those viewers into the primetime hours. That's where the money is.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

38 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

CNN Hired People to Support Trump on air and stipulated that they NEVER bash him [View all] LaydeeBug Dec 2016 OP

First, CNN is not a broadcast station. They're a cable outlet. Exilednight Dec 2016 #1

"that's where the viewers were???" when the fuck did the news become supply side? LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #2

The distinction is a very big deal. Exilednight Dec 2016 #3

You're coming from THEIR end...not from OUR end and you know it. LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #11

Those are just facts. Exilednight Dec 2016 #13

No...that's how they try and frame the narrative. Please proceed. Pretend. LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #14

2 questions for you. Exilednight Dec 2016 #15

Thanks for your attempt to marginalize the issue by insisting *I* submit answers to your questions LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #16

Think what you want, but facts are facts. Exilednight Dec 2016 #18

I think you and Ladybug are both right. pangaia Dec 2016 #27

You don't think NBC, CBS, and ABC need/want to make profits to stay in business? spooky3 Dec 2016 #23

Broadcast networks would like their news hours to be profitable, but Exilednight Dec 2016 #25

where is your link to support that? spooky3 Dec 2016 #26

No network actually covers th cost for producing one hour Exilednight Dec 2016 #29

News, especially cable news, has been profit driven for some time now Va Lefty Dec 2016 #5

Proof Kolesar Dec 2016 #8

Here is the proof mcar Dec 2016 #12

Thank you, mcar! Cha Dec 2016 #30

"Network" must be seen as a documentary . . . . . no_hypocrisy Dec 2016 #4

Ben Mankiewicz noted the realities LeftInTX Dec 2016 #6

Corey Lewandowsky was the head Trump cheerleader at CNN. oasis Dec 2016 #7

They didn't just "do the same for Hillary" FBaggins Dec 2016 #9

Nice try. No dice. LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #10

Baloney. They had a list of three GOP candidates that they hoped wouldn't get eliminated early. bettyellen Dec 2016 #17

One must truly twist reality and oneself into quite the pretzel to come with prime nonsense synergie Dec 2016 #22

exactly. it was in the leaked emails. m-lekktor Dec 2016 #31

The propaganda is getting over the top. Why is anyone watching this nonsense? Turn that shit off!! AgadorSparticus Dec 2016 #19

We need to let their advertisers know that we vote each day with our dollars. nt LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #20

Yessss!!!! Let them know and turn it off until they act responsibly. AgadorSparticus Dec 2016 #21

We don't have much room to complain. Donna Brazile. jalan48 Dec 2016 #24

Donna Brazille was fired...was Lewandowski? False equivalence much? nt LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #32

So she leaks a debate question to Hillary, gets fired by CNN and remains the Chair of our Party. jalan48 Dec 2016 #33

Holy fuck, now you've FURTHERED the false equivalence *AND* extended it to Hillary. LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #34

Post removed Post removed Dec 2016 #35

You can't. LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #36

CNNFux gnewz lite. diet fux. pansypoo53219 Dec 2016 #28

I don't doubt it. Today's CNN sucks, but it would be nice if you provided a link in your OP mtnsnake Dec 2016 #37

It would be nice if the Courts Orders were followed too LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #38