Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Nate Silver: Clinton 'almost certainly' would've won before FBI letter [View all]yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)61. We need to recognize that most people...
don't give a shit who is president!
That sucks, too.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Nate Silver: Clinton 'almost certainly' would've won before FBI letter [View all]
yallerdawg
Dec 2016
OP
Definitely! There's just too much of a backstory for it not to be politically motivated
NWCorona
Dec 2016
#9
If he has a private blackmail file, as Hoover had, that needs to be dealt with as well. nt
ladjf
Dec 2016
#32
This election has caused me to lose much of my sense of civility. If I ever see...
Buckeye_Democrat
Dec 2016
#2
I didn't want to believe it either. I thought he might've included too many "junk polls"...
Buckeye_Democrat
Dec 2016
#11
He had to defend his model because he didn't have Hillary at 90%+ like the rest
NWCorona
Dec 2016
#10
I remember that too. He seemed to give her a "bump" near the end and...
Buckeye_Democrat
Dec 2016
#15
He doesn't do polls himself. He uses polls provided by others and his program aggregates these polls
LisaL
Dec 2016
#22
Silver made a fool of himself... he had us all believing his BS. I know so many who thought we had it "in the bag" and didn't bother showing up to vote...
InAbLuEsTaTe
Dec 2016
#28
One of many responsible, starting with the candidate... though how she lost to a blithering idiot, Nazi racist lunatic, I'll never understand!!
InAbLuEsTaTe
Dec 2016
#74
Yes I remember seeing the large 'undecideds' on the road to 270 site and I said if that is true
TrekLuver
Dec 2016
#69
It's not the letter, it's the oversensationalized overemphasized "News" coverage of it. nt
JCanete
Dec 2016
#12
I'm not excusing him or his intentions. I think those are pretty clear. How those intentions played
JCanete
Dec 2016
#16
known or hoped, it doesn't matter. It's not like the media is actually a dog you wag, as much
JCanete
Dec 2016
#26
There would be nothing for it to focus on if Comey didn't send his letter, knowing full well it will
LisaL
Dec 2016
#29
Add to that that FBI knew about the letters at least since early October, from what has been
LisaL
Dec 2016
#25
The same can be said of his July press conference. He deliberately chose his words
StevieM
Dec 2016
#38
No question... Comey should be frog marched out of the building and tried for his crimes!!
InAbLuEsTaTe
Dec 2016
#34
How long did it take you to hear about the water protectors from a mainstream source?
JCanete
Dec 2016
#45
I see your point and, yes, it's likely the Rethug friendly media would've focused on something else to tRump's benefit.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Dec 2016
#70
Also suggestive, but even if definitive, it wouldn't account for that 8-pt leap in WI.
ucrdem
Dec 2016
#51
We've got US senators of both parties calling for investigations into this election.
ucrdem
Dec 2016
#64
It looks like Silver's 59-30 margin for WI came from the CNN exit polls?
Buckeye_Democrat
Dec 2016
#62
We do know one thing. The email investigation was not being reopened per the letter, and the media
still_one
Dec 2016
#42
Actually whe MSNBC grabbed opened a breaking news saying the email investigation had been
still_one
Dec 2016
#39
How can someone be one week from the election and wavering between Clinton and Trump???
Roland99
Dec 2016
#58
They were voters who disliked Clinton but were nervous about Trump. In the end, they decided
Midwestern Democrat
Dec 2016
#73
i agree, and recognized the disastrous timing at the time-- but there was nothing to be done
andym
Dec 2016
#77
Yes-- the timing couldn't have been worse-- suppressed the early Democratic leaning vote
andym
Dec 2016
#82