Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
17. It's not as simple as "the wealthy have more money than the rest of us". Never has been.
Wed Dec 21, 2016, 08:26 PM
Dec 2016

It's that more and more wealth is getting concentrated into fewer and fewer hands. And that our party has concluded that, to get the support of those fewer and fewer people who have more and more wealth, its message has to be reduced to being progressive only on ONE set of issues...issues that are worthy, but which are nonthreatening and nontransformation, that are "safe" and will not lead to anything close to the ideas that

A) Those with more wealth should actually pay at least somewhat higher taxes,

B) there needs to be a continuing and expanded governmental role in addressing healthcare and at least alleviating poverty(we know now that charitable and voluntary efforts can't ever make a serious dent in that problem, because they are designed NOT to do so, but simply to give good "pr" to "the brand" and let celebrities pose with the poor kids they rented for the afternoon while affecting Christlike expressions);

C) If outsourcing, trade deals and automation put people out of good-paying work in this country, there is an obligation to create other good-paying work for those people and to make it as quick and easy and affordable as possible for those people to get training to do other jobs;

D) There's a moral and ethical obligation to make sure that no areas of the country turn into "job deserts", with people from those areas being forced to travel the country looking for ANY sort of work, not living anywhere long enough to have a home, a voice, or a vote;

One thing I've been amazed by... vi5 Dec 2016 #1
Excellent points! Docreed2003 Dec 2016 #4
Oh bullshit. OilemFirchen Dec 2016 #6
So it wasn't voter suppression or ID laws? vi5 Dec 2016 #8
There were a ton of factors. OilemFirchen Dec 2016 #13
In most states, just about anything will suffice for an ID, even a utility bill. Hoyt Dec 2016 #27
I don't disagree.... vi5 Dec 2016 #50
Hello, neighbor! Buckeye_Democrat Dec 2016 #26
The work I saw with the Clinton campaign was about registering to vote NOT GOTV csziggy Dec 2016 #56
Trump used this bogus claim to great effect Gothmog Dec 2016 #2
The problem is that it wasn't "bogus" - the system IS rigged. forjusticethunders Dec 2016 #5
There are two problems-first Sanders had no chance of being the nominee and the DNC did not fix race Gothmog Dec 2016 #7
You misunderstand - Sanders's entire point was that both parties were doing the "rigging". forjusticethunders Dec 2016 #34
The system was rigged against Bernie. Joe941 Dec 2016 #9
How? Sanders lost due to the fact that Jewish, African American and Latino voters rejected him Gothmog Dec 2016 #14
Super delegates cost him the primaries - totally changed how the primary progressed! Joe941 Dec 2016 #52
Super delegates had nothing to do with Sanders lost Gothmog Dec 2016 #54
You assume starting out with a 700 delegate lead has no bearing on the rest of the race. It changes Joe941 Dec 2016 #57
Sanders got less than 43% of the popular vote in the primaries Gothmog Dec 2016 #58
Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2016 #20
Trump was always going to say exactly what he said. Ken Burch Dec 2016 #15
Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2016 #21
This is how I see it... Docreed2003 Dec 2016 #3
Strange how the "system is rigged" choir has fallen silent. ucrdem Dec 2016 #10
Are you going to claim that our economic system isn't tilted towards the wealthy, "rigged", if you dionysus Dec 2016 #11
It's a revelation to you that the wealthy have more money than the rest of us? ucrdem Dec 2016 #12
It's not as simple as "the wealthy have more money than the rest of us". Never has been. Ken Burch Dec 2016 #17
Wow, you seem a trifle upset. I suppose if trump said the sky was blue, after dionysus Dec 2016 #18
Dayum I lve you. sheshe2 Dec 2016 #31
Heya sheshe!!! ucrdem Dec 2016 #33
Thank you... sheshe2 Dec 2016 #36
backatcha sheshe ucrdem Dec 2016 #42
It hasn't. Sanders supporters have been just as outspoken about the bogusness of Trump's "victory" Ken Burch Dec 2016 #16
These giys have to blame someone, something, for this loss (other than dionysus Dec 2016 #19
Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2016 #22
That's a lot of straw. By that turn, i could say liberals aren't president of the college dionysus Dec 2016 #23
Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2016 #24
She lost any right to claim she cared more than Bernie about civil rights Ken Burch Dec 2016 #28
Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2016 #35
He was upset because they disrupted the event for no good reason Ken Burch Dec 2016 #37
Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2016 #38
At the time, Hillary hadn't said anything explicitly in support of BLM Ken Burch Dec 2016 #40
What happened to our friend? Was the strain of this post more than they could bear? dionysus Dec 2016 #48
You mean he didn't usher them backstage, and wag his finger at them? dionysus Dec 2016 #46
Bernie was equal to Hillary in his civil rights commitment. Ken Burch Dec 2016 #30
Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2016 #39
Actually, he made speaking out about racism a standard part of his stump speech Ken Burch Dec 2016 #41
Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2016 #43
There's no way you can seriously argue he wasn't to the left of HRC. Ken Burch Dec 2016 #45
Another strawman-there are very valid reasons why Sanders did not do well with AA and other votes Gothmog Dec 2016 #55
Bravo/ Brava! sheshe2 Dec 2016 #32
You are honestly saying with a straight face that MANY BernieBros Grey Lemercier Dec 2016 #47
Actually yes. Ken Burch Dec 2016 #60
You and I exist on different planets Grey Lemercier Dec 2016 #61
Many of them have been, yes. kcr Dec 2016 #51
Nothing. The Electoral College system is rigged to make the votes pnwmom Dec 2016 #25
Thank you. It's the last vestige of the slave system. Ken Burch Dec 2016 #29
Elizabeth Warren says 'the system is rigged' (2012) think Dec 2016 #44
Because it's mostly a backlash against things like a Black President and Women and others gaining JI7 Dec 2016 #49
It has nothing to do with banks rigging markets, becoming felons, and no one going to jail? think Dec 2016 #53
Apparently you never listened to an entire Clinton speech emulatorloo Dec 2016 #59
The system's having been rigged is why we're all here. It's not open to debate. Orsino Dec 2016 #62
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»What's so terrible about ...»Reply #17