Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Sunriser13

(612 posts)
19. Of course it did, since they won.
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 07:10 AM
Jan 2017

Before the election, all they could say was how everything was hacked.

Funny how many of those voices are now silent...

Thanks triron Dec 2016 #1
I would like to see us go back to precinct voting with paper ballots... kentuck Dec 2016 #2
Let's go back to handwritten sales receipts, too... TreasonousBastard Dec 2016 #4
If we're going to have machine voting, it should be done correctly kcr Dec 2016 #5
Yes. there should be a paper trail, but to condemn all machines for the sins of a few is silly... TreasonousBastard Dec 2016 #8
The manufacturers of voting machines also make ATMs crazycatlady Jan 2017 #46
Still how do we know that the internally counted vote is triron Jan 2017 #47
If the machines are Internet enabled as has been reported here numerous times HoneyBadger Jan 2017 #49
No problem, if it would bring integrity to the voting process back uponit7771 Jan 2017 #14
My point is simply that it wouldn't. Andwhere did you get the idea that... TreasonousBastard Jan 2017 #16
Of course, I'm not a "they've already decided" or anything close type voter uponit7771 Jan 2017 #17
So give us better verification methods. Sunriser13 Jan 2017 #18
What do you want? At this point a scanner reads your little black dots and adds them up... TreasonousBastard Jan 2017 #20
Electronically vote with a coded paper receipt for the recount that is also texted to you HoneyBadger Jan 2017 #25
And for those who don't have cell phones? SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2017 #27
Better verification cannot happen without electronic verification HoneyBadger Jan 2017 #29
OK SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2017 #30
Don't need id to vote absentee HoneyBadger Jan 2017 #31
oh please, the presidency of the US is a little more important that cash register receipt; and ballo TheFrenchRazor Jan 2017 #37
Paper is too easy to hack HoneyBadger Dec 2016 #10
WTF??? is that you Pootie? PAPER BALLOTS, HAND COUNTED!! no machine to "run it through," OK? TheFrenchRazor Jan 2017 #12
Unless the count happens in front of the voter there is no assurance that their vote actually counts HoneyBadger Jan 2017 #21
3 person team counts votes; this is nothing new. there is no way that paper is *easier* to hack TheFrenchRazor Jan 2017 #34
It is infinitely easier to make a pencil mark on a piece of paper than it is to hack a computer HoneyBadger Jan 2017 #36
please explain how this will happen directly under the eyes of poll workers from TheFrenchRazor Jan 2017 #38
What happens when 1000 ballots are recorded, a recount is ordered by the Greens and there HoneyBadger Jan 2017 #50
you could say the exact same thing about machines, X1000. nt TheFrenchRazor Jan 2017 #53
The problem is that Republicans think the election worked just fine. charlyvi Dec 2016 #3
exactly. nt TheFrenchRazor Dec 2016 #7
They know somethings fucked up about this election and gish gallop all Benedict Donald's Putin uponit7771 Jan 2017 #15
Of course it did, since they won. Sunriser13 Jan 2017 #19
problems need to be fixed, but they won't be. nt TheFrenchRazor Dec 2016 #6
Yes we have, and getting worse. elleng Dec 2016 #9
k and r Achilleaze Dec 2016 #11
THANK YOU !!! If they fucked us this time what's to stop the from fucking us again !?!?! uponit7771 Jan 2017 #13
Nothing MoonRiver Jan 2017 #23
+1 uponit7771 Jan 2017 #24
And it'll just be worse since the Republicans now have total power in federal/state Governments. KittyWampus Jan 2017 #32
Yeap, they've already shown they'll break the law without Russian help uponit7771 Jan 2017 #33
Paper ok - machine only if system designed for security with adequate approriate audit and recount Kashkakat v.2.0 Jan 2017 #22
It should be, but likely little will happen, certainly not by the GOP who would sell RKP5637 Jan 2017 #26
I'm in favor of paper ballots SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2017 #28
paper receipts are useless because they never see the light of day. votes must be hand-counted the f TheFrenchRazor Jan 2017 #35
Sorry, I completely disagree n/t SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2017 #40
so you don't think the local powers-that-be could prevent those paper receipts from being seen? seri TheFrenchRazor Jan 2017 #42
If there is a hand recount SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2017 #43
I'm confused by your answer triron Jan 2017 #44
Not sure why SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2017 #45
well, that's kind of the point. the local authorities determine whether there is a hand recount; ev TheFrenchRazor Jan 2017 #48
No, I don't think it's a problem SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2017 #51
ok; you're fine with invisible votes and selective recounts; i'm not. glad we got that cleared up. TheFrenchRazor Jan 2017 #54
You are right. There is no integrity left in US election results. UCmeNdc Jan 2017 #39
yes only sure way. triron Jan 2017 #41
KnR Hekate Jan 2017 #52
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»We have serious threats t...»Reply #19