Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: We have serious threats to election integrity that must be fixed before the next election. [View all]SickOfTheOnePct
(7,352 posts)43. If there is a hand recount
they have to be seen. If there isn't a hand recount, there is no reason for them to be seen.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
We have serious threats to election integrity that must be fixed before the next election. [View all]
pnwmom
Dec 2016
OP
Yes. there should be a paper trail, but to condemn all machines for the sins of a few is silly...
TreasonousBastard
Dec 2016
#8
If the machines are Internet enabled as has been reported here numerous times
HoneyBadger
Jan 2017
#49
My point is simply that it wouldn't. Andwhere did you get the idea that...
TreasonousBastard
Jan 2017
#16
What do you want? At this point a scanner reads your little black dots and adds them up...
TreasonousBastard
Jan 2017
#20
Electronically vote with a coded paper receipt for the recount that is also texted to you
HoneyBadger
Jan 2017
#25
oh please, the presidency of the US is a little more important that cash register receipt; and ballo
TheFrenchRazor
Jan 2017
#37
WTF??? is that you Pootie? PAPER BALLOTS, HAND COUNTED!! no machine to "run it through," OK?
TheFrenchRazor
Jan 2017
#12
Unless the count happens in front of the voter there is no assurance that their vote actually counts
HoneyBadger
Jan 2017
#21
3 person team counts votes; this is nothing new. there is no way that paper is *easier* to hack
TheFrenchRazor
Jan 2017
#34
It is infinitely easier to make a pencil mark on a piece of paper than it is to hack a computer
HoneyBadger
Jan 2017
#36
please explain how this will happen directly under the eyes of poll workers from
TheFrenchRazor
Jan 2017
#38
What happens when 1000 ballots are recorded, a recount is ordered by the Greens and there
HoneyBadger
Jan 2017
#50
They know somethings fucked up about this election and gish gallop all Benedict Donald's Putin
uponit7771
Jan 2017
#15
THANK YOU !!! If they fucked us this time what's to stop the from fucking us again !?!?!
uponit7771
Jan 2017
#13
And it'll just be worse since the Republicans now have total power in federal/state Governments.
KittyWampus
Jan 2017
#32
Paper ok - machine only if system designed for security with adequate approriate audit and recount
Kashkakat v.2.0
Jan 2017
#22
It should be, but likely little will happen, certainly not by the GOP who would sell
RKP5637
Jan 2017
#26
paper receipts are useless because they never see the light of day. votes must be hand-counted the f
TheFrenchRazor
Jan 2017
#35
so you don't think the local powers-that-be could prevent those paper receipts from being seen? seri
TheFrenchRazor
Jan 2017
#42
well, that's kind of the point. the local authorities determine whether there is a hand recount; ev
TheFrenchRazor
Jan 2017
#48
ok; you're fine with invisible votes and selective recounts; i'm not. glad we got that cleared up.
TheFrenchRazor
Jan 2017
#54