Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Exilednight

(9,359 posts)
32. So, you want me to believe you, some anonymous person
Sun Jan 8, 2017, 06:20 PM
Jan 2017

on the internet peddling conspiracy theory bullshit with absolutely zero evidence, but not actual public figures that belong to my party and actually have to deal with the consequences and their public reputations if there is even a hint of this being true?

I know who I believe.

But keep trying, buddy. You might feel more at home at one of those birther or truthers websites.

I also love the way you peddle half truths by saying "those machines CAN ABSOLUTELY BE HACKED" and you are only half right, they can only be hacked if you are in the presence of the machine. If you're saying they can be remotely hacked, then provide proof from a first hand expert of the machines in question, because every first hand expert when asked has put their name out there and said it is impossible to do it remotely.

those people have 'occupied high ranking positions.' WTF! pangaia Jan 2017 #1
Yes I saw this way back when it first came out. triron Jan 2017 #2
knr triron Jan 2017 #3
kick again triron Jan 2017 #4
k and r. Stuart G Jan 2017 #5
This is treason Gothmog Jan 2017 #6
It is *INDEED* treason, and I was called every name for saying it was LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #9
Well perhaps sedition is more appropriate. triron Jan 2017 #11
aid and comfort to the enemy. If Bill Clinton's blojob was an example of high crimes and LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #53
above "aid .. to the enemy" is correct. triron Jan 2017 #54
Russia declared war on us...CYBER war is still an act of war. nt LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #55
UNREAL. IF this was a Dem. The media and Republicans would be out for blood Thrill Jan 2017 #7
Yup. There's no such thing as "politically awkward" for a Repug. 50 Shades Of Blue Jan 2017 #8
K&R 2naSalit Jan 2017 #10
TREASON IS WHAT IT IS...!!!!!!!!!!!! Stuart G Jan 2017 #12
Infuriating the way the mainstream media rarely mentions this element of the story! ElementaryPenguin Jan 2017 #13
Of *course* not. That would make them accountable. nt LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #14
The Siberian Candiate Cha Jan 2017 #15
Yep. Soviet Donald. How much money does he owe them? nt LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #16
Follow the fucking money.. if we only could. Tax Retuns, Pervert?! Cha Jan 2017 #17
Oh don't even get me STARTED on that 13 year old...nt LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #18
And during this time Putin was orchestrating the hacking. triron Jan 2017 #19
Well Soviet Donald said he wasn't incontact with Putin... LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #20
kick for visibility triron Jan 2017 #21
kick LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #50
kick again triron Jan 2017 #22
Never be afraid to speak truth to power. What are the odds of this happening? LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #23
knr triron Jan 2017 #24
K&R... spanone Jan 2017 #25
kick again triron Jan 2017 #26
"Obviously" says Deputy Foreign Minister. Access to "Agent Orange" oasis Jan 2017 #27
I hope they appoint a special prosecutor in the next few days, before it's too late. nt LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #28
Benedict Donald would just fire the prosecutor. oasis Jan 2017 #30
Okay, we're all in agreement that the intelligence agencies within the US Exilednight Jan 2017 #29
Mmmmm Hmmmmm. Or the ones who believe the magic bullet theory LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #31
So, you want me to believe you, some anonymous person Exilednight Jan 2017 #32
So you want me to believe you, some anonymous person LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #33
Now you want me to believe that Russians sent thousands of people over to hack the machines Exilednight Jan 2017 #34
Who said *anything* about THOUSANDS? LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #35
To turn the election you would have to send thousands to hack thousands of machines. Exilednight Jan 2017 #37
Nope. Not even, and you know it LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #38
Statements like that prove you know nothing of the country you live in. Exilednight Jan 2017 #39
Statements like that prove you know nothing of the country YOU live in LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #49
Show me the proof from credible firsthand sources that THOUSANDS would be needed LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #36
Okay. Here you go. Exilednight Jan 2017 #40
except that... LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #41
Except the chips aren't stored with the machines. Nice try, Exilednight Jan 2017 #42
unless it's already been hacked. LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #43
Did you even read the article? Exilednight Jan 2017 #44
Yep LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #45
also: LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #46
Do you have any credible sources? Exilednight Jan 2017 #47
Yes. Do you? LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #48
Lock Him Up. eom Blanks Jan 2017 #51
rule of law. rule of law. LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #52
That'll work too. Blanks Jan 2017 #58
kick for visibility triron Jan 2017 #56
knr triron Jan 2017 #57
kick. LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #59
Figured this out long ago myself triron Jan 2017 #60
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Russia says it was in tou...»Reply #32