2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Dkos: No, Senator Sanders; YOU are out of touch (opinion piece) [View all]R B Garr
(17,379 posts)have $50 million, so your point is once again meaningless. It's as meaningless as you insisting that everyone on a boat is an "average" person with average income and not some affluent type that the Berners are so obsessed with. Heck, I'm just a housewife, and the Berners called me an elitist corporatist, lol. That's why your empty, vapid obsession with one-uppers and name-calling is now just scorned as the pure nonsense that it is.
Once again, the purity brigade about those with money tries and fails. Money and corporations and all that jazz are just fine if they support Bernie. If they don't, then they are evil. I have to laugh at you going all out to support your empty "attack" about Clooney when Susan Sarandon is a loaded celebrity who supports "corporations" as long as they sell what she is hawking, like cashmere and make-up. Yet, she's just fine with the Berners.
The silliness of all the divisive attacks on other Democrats simply to adhere to some rah-rah lines about Bernie lost it's fizzle back when he lost the primaries. And once again, that was about the hypocrisy of comments such as yours. Bernie put himself out as the pure and goodly option like the Republican family values of purity, but he doesn't even adhere to his own standards. It's about hypocrisy, not celebrities.
And none of those celebrities were out there handing Trump and the GOP attack lines about our nominee. Those came from Bernie. So your quote about Tillerson is once again meaningless since those attacks on Hillary helped get Tillerson where he is. How are Trump's billionaires working out for you?