Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hedge Fund Titans Choosing Hillary Clinton Over Top Republicans [View all]Response to ibewlu606 (Reply #5)
Post removed
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
279 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hedge Fund Titans Choosing Hillary Clinton Over Top Republicans [View all]
Ichingcarpenter
Jul 2015
OP
Perhaps, but it could also be a reflection of the craziness of what the Republican Party has become
still_one
Jul 2015
#26
I wouldn't have voted to hide the post that told the misogynist to fuck off.
boston bean
Jul 2015
#131
Sorry, but then you would be wrong. And that's why this jury system is so badly broken.
cui bono
Jul 2015
#241
Agree, totally uncalled for. There's so much to criticize Hillary for without resorting to crude name calling.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jul 2015
#67
That was my alert, and was stunned that four people voted to keep it (with NO rationale)
George II
Jul 2015
#83
It would still be rude, but less obviously so. Historically, that word has been directed at women
MADem
Jul 2015
#271
I am not planning on using any sexist, racist or other -ist insults, so I suspect I'll be fine.
MADem
Jul 2015
#275
I didn't call her that and it was an unfortunate choice of words on the part of the poster.
PatrickforO
Jul 2015
#129
BOTH should have been hidden and I'm sorry the one upthread wasn't.
beam me up scottie
Jul 2015
#222
You should hide that post. If that is the only way you can express disagreement it speaks volumes
still_one
Jul 2015
#29
There was no HIDE--the person who OBJECTED to the WHORE characterization got the HIDE.
MADem
Jul 2015
#89
You applauded an op in the HC group who called Sanders supporters whores.
beam me up scottie
Jul 2015
#211
Let's have a link for context, so I can see me applauding a post calling a woman a whore.
MADem
Jul 2015
#212
Do you really need a link to the post calling Sanders supporters whores?
beam me up scottie
Jul 2015
#218
I wasn't laughing about the "w" word at all. You have difficulty with context, I see.
MADem
Jul 2015
#267
and it looks like a "hit and run". Make an outrageous post, and then crawl back in the hole where
still_one
Jul 2015
#90
DU jury people just let you get away with that "whore" bullshit. Maybe you're just too fucking new.
ancianita
Jul 2015
#31
Curiuously the three who voted to hide had coherent comments to explain their votes....
George II
Jul 2015
#37
I've seen plenty of IBEW and pipe fitter Union stickers next to Romney stickers on pick-up trucks
Hassin Bin Sober
Jul 2015
#96
Because only a Sanders supporter would throw out a misogynistic slur like that, right?
historylovr
Jul 2015
#105
I believe it was not. And hosts replied in the subthread and never asked for a self-delete or gave
cui bono
Jul 2015
#248
They won't. You still can't find anybody who admits they voted for richard nixon.
calimary
Jul 2015
#139
Okay, I admit it....in 1968 (the FIRST election in which I voted) I voted for Nixon.
George II
Jul 2015
#251
That is why you are NEEDED on jury duty--if it had been you, instead of one of those no-comment
MADem
Jul 2015
#108
Considering the context "FU" response to the poster was appropriate, but also a clear violation
still_one
Jul 2015
#157
I have found that the cleverest disruptors try to use a misunderstanding of the jury process to
MADem
Jul 2015
#197
You can alert on the jury results and ask the admins to look at the posters who voted to leave it.
MADem
Jul 2015
#92
You comment needs to be removed. That's as disgusting as someone who called Bernie a flying turd
Autumn
Jul 2015
#82
I don't think that calling bernie a flying turd was a bigoted slur, was it?
boston bean
Jul 2015
#106
Both are. But calling Bernie a flying turd, is nothing like using a misogynistic/sexist slur.
boston bean
Jul 2015
#121
Whatever but I'm not interested in the discussion you want to have. So find someone else.
Autumn
Jul 2015
#126
What does it matter which category it falls under? They are both offensive and wrong.
cui bono
Jul 2015
#242
No, it doesn't. Unless you are biased in some way or are letting something cloud your objectivity.
cui bono
Jul 2015
#247
The bias was included in the first comment that spawned this thread. My objectivity is crystal clear
boston bean
Jul 2015
#249
No, it really isn't. You posted above that you would not have hidden the reply to the despicable
cui bono
Jul 2015
#250
right because I don't put an general insult in the same category as a misogynistic slur. YMMV.
boston bean
Jul 2015
#252
There are others...others who have been here for years and have lots of posts.
Cali_Democrat
Jul 2015
#169
Just so you know, Bernie fans, SHIT LIKE THIS is making the rest of you look HORRIBLE.
calimary
Jul 2015
#122
Don't go blaming ALL Bernie supporters. A lot of us have condemned that post.
cui bono
Jul 2015
#238
When I serve on a DU jury I try to be impartial, no matter my candidate of choice. It's too bad the
Metric System
Jul 2015
#145
I'm sure the rest of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union 606...
wyldwolf
Jul 2015
#227
Replying to more easily track whether admins protect their candidate by deleting and banning
aikoaiko
Jul 2015
#229
I didn't defend the post. I advised him to change it and not use do this again.
aikoaiko
Jul 2015
#232
That's uncalled for and just plain wrong. Since it survived, you should self-delete. n/t
cui bono
Jul 2015
#234
Oh? Hedge fund titans preferred Mitt Romney to President Obama in 2011-2012 fundraising.
En Garde
Jul 2015
#15
It's all in the family. Her son-in-law runs his own hedge fund. They trust Hillary to take care...
En Garde
Jul 2015
#9
So Democrats have their very own .00001% candidate this year... we are so lucky.
En Garde
Jul 2015
#38
''But my vision of the future is a vision that cannot be lived until it comes about. ''
Ichingcarpenter
Jul 2015
#183
Surprise - Surprise - Wonder What Those 1% Want In Return - Guaranteed Their Wants Won't Help The 99%
cantbeserious
Jul 2015
#19
She has to be the BEST how else could she have raised all that MONEY? Caus MOLNEY is the ultimate
Vincardog
Jul 2015
#60
Groups like that usually contribute to both sides. Even Unions and environmental groups will
Hoyt
Jul 2015
#133
I knew what you meant. Don't worry about the OP who can't put it together.
boston bean
Jul 2015
#196
"The candidate’s populist rhetoric didn’t dissuade many managers from supporting her."
arcane1
Jul 2015
#186