Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hedge Fund Titans Choosing Hillary Clinton Over Top Republicans [View all]whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)171. Care to point them out
or are you just going to toss cowardly shitbombs around? Also, what do these phantoms have to do with what the newb said?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
279 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hedge Fund Titans Choosing Hillary Clinton Over Top Republicans [View all]
Ichingcarpenter
Jul 2015
OP
Perhaps, but it could also be a reflection of the craziness of what the Republican Party has become
still_one
Jul 2015
#26
I wouldn't have voted to hide the post that told the misogynist to fuck off.
boston bean
Jul 2015
#131
Sorry, but then you would be wrong. And that's why this jury system is so badly broken.
cui bono
Jul 2015
#241
Agree, totally uncalled for. There's so much to criticize Hillary for without resorting to crude name calling.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jul 2015
#67
That was my alert, and was stunned that four people voted to keep it (with NO rationale)
George II
Jul 2015
#83
It would still be rude, but less obviously so. Historically, that word has been directed at women
MADem
Jul 2015
#271
I am not planning on using any sexist, racist or other -ist insults, so I suspect I'll be fine.
MADem
Jul 2015
#275
I didn't call her that and it was an unfortunate choice of words on the part of the poster.
PatrickforO
Jul 2015
#129
BOTH should have been hidden and I'm sorry the one upthread wasn't.
beam me up scottie
Jul 2015
#222
You should hide that post. If that is the only way you can express disagreement it speaks volumes
still_one
Jul 2015
#29
There was no HIDE--the person who OBJECTED to the WHORE characterization got the HIDE.
MADem
Jul 2015
#89
You applauded an op in the HC group who called Sanders supporters whores.
beam me up scottie
Jul 2015
#211
Let's have a link for context, so I can see me applauding a post calling a woman a whore.
MADem
Jul 2015
#212
Do you really need a link to the post calling Sanders supporters whores?
beam me up scottie
Jul 2015
#218
I wasn't laughing about the "w" word at all. You have difficulty with context, I see.
MADem
Jul 2015
#267
and it looks like a "hit and run". Make an outrageous post, and then crawl back in the hole where
still_one
Jul 2015
#90
DU jury people just let you get away with that "whore" bullshit. Maybe you're just too fucking new.
ancianita
Jul 2015
#31
Curiuously the three who voted to hide had coherent comments to explain their votes....
George II
Jul 2015
#37
I've seen plenty of IBEW and pipe fitter Union stickers next to Romney stickers on pick-up trucks
Hassin Bin Sober
Jul 2015
#96
Because only a Sanders supporter would throw out a misogynistic slur like that, right?
historylovr
Jul 2015
#105
I believe it was not. And hosts replied in the subthread and never asked for a self-delete or gave
cui bono
Jul 2015
#248
They won't. You still can't find anybody who admits they voted for richard nixon.
calimary
Jul 2015
#139
Okay, I admit it....in 1968 (the FIRST election in which I voted) I voted for Nixon.
George II
Jul 2015
#251
That is why you are NEEDED on jury duty--if it had been you, instead of one of those no-comment
MADem
Jul 2015
#108
Considering the context "FU" response to the poster was appropriate, but also a clear violation
still_one
Jul 2015
#157
I have found that the cleverest disruptors try to use a misunderstanding of the jury process to
MADem
Jul 2015
#197
You can alert on the jury results and ask the admins to look at the posters who voted to leave it.
MADem
Jul 2015
#92
You comment needs to be removed. That's as disgusting as someone who called Bernie a flying turd
Autumn
Jul 2015
#82
I don't think that calling bernie a flying turd was a bigoted slur, was it?
boston bean
Jul 2015
#106
Both are. But calling Bernie a flying turd, is nothing like using a misogynistic/sexist slur.
boston bean
Jul 2015
#121
Whatever but I'm not interested in the discussion you want to have. So find someone else.
Autumn
Jul 2015
#126
What does it matter which category it falls under? They are both offensive and wrong.
cui bono
Jul 2015
#242
No, it doesn't. Unless you are biased in some way or are letting something cloud your objectivity.
cui bono
Jul 2015
#247
The bias was included in the first comment that spawned this thread. My objectivity is crystal clear
boston bean
Jul 2015
#249
No, it really isn't. You posted above that you would not have hidden the reply to the despicable
cui bono
Jul 2015
#250
right because I don't put an general insult in the same category as a misogynistic slur. YMMV.
boston bean
Jul 2015
#252
There are others...others who have been here for years and have lots of posts.
Cali_Democrat
Jul 2015
#169
Just so you know, Bernie fans, SHIT LIKE THIS is making the rest of you look HORRIBLE.
calimary
Jul 2015
#122
Don't go blaming ALL Bernie supporters. A lot of us have condemned that post.
cui bono
Jul 2015
#238
When I serve on a DU jury I try to be impartial, no matter my candidate of choice. It's too bad the
Metric System
Jul 2015
#145
I'm sure the rest of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union 606...
wyldwolf
Jul 2015
#227
Replying to more easily track whether admins protect their candidate by deleting and banning
aikoaiko
Jul 2015
#229
I didn't defend the post. I advised him to change it and not use do this again.
aikoaiko
Jul 2015
#232
That's uncalled for and just plain wrong. Since it survived, you should self-delete. n/t
cui bono
Jul 2015
#234
Oh? Hedge fund titans preferred Mitt Romney to President Obama in 2011-2012 fundraising.
En Garde
Jul 2015
#15
It's all in the family. Her son-in-law runs his own hedge fund. They trust Hillary to take care...
En Garde
Jul 2015
#9
So Democrats have their very own .00001% candidate this year... we are so lucky.
En Garde
Jul 2015
#38
''But my vision of the future is a vision that cannot be lived until it comes about. ''
Ichingcarpenter
Jul 2015
#183
Surprise - Surprise - Wonder What Those 1% Want In Return - Guaranteed Their Wants Won't Help The 99%
cantbeserious
Jul 2015
#19
She has to be the BEST how else could she have raised all that MONEY? Caus MOLNEY is the ultimate
Vincardog
Jul 2015
#60
Groups like that usually contribute to both sides. Even Unions and environmental groups will
Hoyt
Jul 2015
#133
I knew what you meant. Don't worry about the OP who can't put it together.
boston bean
Jul 2015
#196
"The candidate’s populist rhetoric didn’t dissuade many managers from supporting her."
arcane1
Jul 2015
#186