Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marble falls

(62,079 posts)
86. From wikipedia:
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 06:43 AM
Apr 2016

U.S. indictment and controversial pardon
2001 The Controversial Pardon of International Fugitive Marc Rich

In 1983 Rich and partner Pincus Green were indicted on 65 criminal counts, including income tax evasion, wire fraud, racketeering, and trading with Iran during the oil embargo (at a time when Iranian revolutionaries were still holding American citizens hostage).[17][7] The charges would have led to a sentence of more than 300 years in prison had Rich been convicted on all counts.[17] The indictment was filed by then-U.S. Federal Prosecutor (and future mayor of New York City) Rudolph Giuliani. At the time it was the biggest tax evasion case in U.S. history.[18]

Hearing of the plans for the indictment, Rich fled[9] to Switzerland and, always insisting that he was not guilty, never returned to the U.S. to answer the charges.[Notes 1] Rich's companies eventually pled guilty to 35 counts of tax evasion and paid $90 million in fines,[7] although Rich himself remained on the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Ten Most-Wanted Fugitives List for many years,[20] narrowly evading capture in Britain, Germany, Finland, and Jamaica.[21] Fearing arrest, he did not even return to the United States to attend his daughter's funeral in 1996.[22]

On January 20, 2001, hours before leaving office, U.S. President Bill Clinton granted Rich a highly controversial presidential pardon. Several of Clinton's strongest supporters distanced themselves from the decision.[23] Former President Jimmy Carter, a fellow Democrat, said, "I don't think there is any doubt that some of the factors in his pardon were attributable to his large gifts. In my opinion, that was disgraceful."[24] Clinton himself later expressed regret for issuing the pardon, saying that "it wasn't worth the damage to my reputation."[9]

Clinton's critics alleged that Rich's pardon had been bought, as Denise Rich had given more than $1 million[25] to Clinton's political party (the Democratic Party), including more than $100,000 to the Senate campaign of the president's wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton, and $450,000 to the Clinton Library foundation during Clinton's time in office.[21] Clinton explained his decision by noting that similar cases were settled in civil, not criminal court.

Clinton also cited clemency pleas he had received from Israeli government officials, including then-Prime Minister Ehud Barak. Rich had made substantial donations to Israeli charitable foundations over the years, and many senior Israeli officials, such as Shimon Peres and Ehud Olmert, argued on his behalf behind the scenes.[26] Speculation about another rationale for Rich's pardon involved his alleged involvement with the Israeli intelligence community.[27][28] Rich reluctantly acknowledged in interviews with his biographer, Daniel Ammann, that he had assisted the Mossad, Israel’s intelligence service,[4][13] a claim that Ammann said was confirmed by a former Israeli intelligence officer.[12] According to Ammann, Rich had helped finance the Mossad's operations and had supplied Israel with strategic amounts of Iranian oil through a secret oil pipeline.[4] The aide to Rich who had persuaded Denise Rich to personally ask President Clinton to review Rich's pardon request was a former chief of the Mossad, Avner Azulay.[22][29] Another former Mossad chief, Shabtai Shavit, had also urged Clinton to pardon Rich,[30] whom he said had routinely allowed intelligence agents to use his offices around the world.[17]

Federal Prosecutor Mary Jo White was appointed to investigate Clinton's last-minute pardon of Rich.[31] She stepped down before the investigation was finished and was replaced by James Comey, who was critical of Clinton's pardons and of then-Deputy Attorney General Eric Holder's pardon recommendation.[32] Rich's lawyer, Jack Quinn, had previously been Clinton's White House Counsel and chief of staff to Clinton's Vice President, Al Gore, and had had a close relationship with Holder.[22] According to Quinn, Holder had advised that standard procedures be bypassed and the pardon petition be submitted directly to the White House.[33][Notes 2] Congressional investigations were also launched. Clinton's top advisors, Chief of Staff John Podesta, White House Counsel Beth Nolan, and advisor Bruce Lindsey, testified that nearly all of the White House staff advising the president on the pardon request had urged Clinton to not grant Rich a pardon.[29] Federal investigators ultimately found no evidence of criminal activity.[30]

As a condition of the pardon, it was made clear that Rich would drop all procedural defenses against any civil actions brought against him by the United States upon his return there. That condition was consistent with the position that his alleged wrongdoing warranted only civil penalties, not criminal punishment. Rich never returned to the United States.[9]

In a February 18, 2001 op-ed essay in The New York Times, Clinton (by then out of office) explained why he had pardoned Rich, noting that U.S. tax professors Bernard Wolfman of the Harvard Law School and Martin Ginsburg of Georgetown University Law Center had concluded that no crime had been committed, and that Rich's companies' tax-reporting position had been reasonable.[19] In the same essay, Clinton listed Lewis "Scooter" Libby as one of three "distinguished Republican lawyers" who supported a pardon for Rich. (Libby himself later received a presidential commutation for his involvement in the Plame affair.) During Congressional hearings after Rich's pardon, Libby, who had represented Rich from 1985 until the spring of 2000, denied that Rich had violated the tax laws but criticized him for trading with Iran at a time when that country was holding U.S. hostages.[35]

Right on. Wellstone ruled Apr 2016 #1
What the Panama Papers Tells Us About Global Capitalism... scottie55 Apr 2016 #2
Unfortunately they're not done ripping us off. Enthusiast Apr 2016 #63
Why did Hillary steal all the White House silverware? Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #3
is the Marc Rich thing a lie? Schema Thing Apr 2016 #4
Don't expect any kind of discussion. Only ranting and distractions. nm rhett o rick Apr 2016 #7
You wont get an answer. You were supposed to cower & go away. 7962 Apr 2016 #10
Only this one is not very "skilled". bvar22 Apr 2016 #99
My understanding is that the crimes of Marc Rich (and Pincus Green) ... HillareeeHillaraah Apr 2016 #32
Whether the criminal charges would result in criminal convictions is something only a court JDPriestly Apr 2016 #36
Why is Hillary supposed to answer for Bill? jzola Apr 2016 #48
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2016 #49
Because when she talks about her experience, she includes her time in the White House as JDPriestly Apr 2016 #51
It's called Coattails Politicalboi Apr 2016 #57
Because she wants to be President? Kokonoe Apr 2016 #61
Didn't Marc Rich flee the country to avoid prosecution FreakinDJ Apr 2016 #53
Holy crap! HillareeeHillaraah Apr 2016 #56
Actually Marc Rich got a better deal for his $1Million FreakinDJ Apr 2016 #59
That's right, OJ is Innocent, because he had a trial. Kokonoe Apr 2016 #64
Thanks to Bill Clinton FreakinDJ Apr 2016 #68
OJ was found "not guilty" dflprincess Apr 2016 #71
YOUR understanding? Oh! didn't know you were a federal judge! Divernan Apr 2016 #83
Your snark becomes you HillareeeHillaraah Apr 2016 #87
High praise re snark coming from you! Divernan Apr 2016 #88
Yes it is nt Buzz cook Apr 2016 #46
From what I've read, Rich was pardoned at the urging of the Israelis. leveymg Apr 2016 #52
What crap! zalinda Apr 2016 #5
We are tired of the corrupt culture that the Clintons represent. nm rhett o rick Apr 2016 #6
Release Tax reurns fun n serious Apr 2016 #12
LOL. Is this the new birther theme? I think we need a lesson in perspective. rhett o rick Apr 2016 #39
I want those returns and so does America fun n serious Apr 2016 #60
So what do you think he's hiding? SammyWinstonJack Apr 2016 #77
I think.. assets changed to wife's name and put in an off shore account (MY OPINION) fun n serious Apr 2016 #78
Did they rent out the Lincoln Bedroom? Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2016 #8
Let's ask the Sanders campaign. They'll consult Rove and get back to us... Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #30
Rove was a Bush Era dude.... Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2016 #31
Projection. Rove is a Bush Crime Family operative on loan to their good friends the Clinton Family. rhett o rick Apr 2016 #40
I thought Rove changed his name to Brock. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2016 #72
With Clinton's money she can afford both. nm rhett o rick Apr 2016 #79
Irrational rhetoric is not my friend. Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #92
Situational ethics is not your friend either. Why did The Big Dog pardon Rich? rhett o rick Apr 2016 #93
And why is this heaped on Hillary? Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #94
How typical, you can't refute direct facts so you try to distract or "just drop it". rhett o rick Apr 2016 #95
Enough tangents. Re-read the OP. Re-read my question: Why would the OP heap Rich on HRC? Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #96
A common thread running thru the Clinton supporters is audacity. "Do this, read that, rhett o rick Apr 2016 #97
I'm responding to an OP blaming HRC, and you consider it audacity for me to ask you to do likewise? Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #98
^This^ Loki Apr 2016 #90
YOU are the one bringing up the lies. dchill Apr 2016 #19
It's an attempt at a distraction. While she stands next to the Clinton mansion on fire she yells, rhett o rick Apr 2016 #42
Uhh...there's a pretty clear public record of this pardon and the money that changed hands rachacha Apr 2016 #20
dishonest dodges = tacit concession of the veracity of that dodged stupidicus Apr 2016 #33
So if the Clintons were falsely accused of one crime they're innocent of all crimes? Scuba Apr 2016 #82
Why is Hillary guilty of every conjured "crime" that Bill committed? Guilt by association? Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #85
They just can't help themselves. Loki Apr 2016 #89
... or if there's a shred of truth in it . Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #91
Please date stamp the accusations. I believe the pardon was BEFORE IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author lastone Apr 2016 #11
You should self-delete dorkzilla Apr 2016 #13
Please a) quit personally insulting me and b) investigate/respond with facts. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #14
I apologize for my uncivil post. lastone Apr 2016 #80
I'm sure the Clinton Foundation was started dorkzilla Apr 2016 #15
Help me out here. Can Bill and Hillary go to work for the Foundation any time they want? rhett o rick Apr 2016 #43
She sure does. Its either $600,000 or $675,000 a year. snagglepuss Apr 2016 #76
Why does the donation need to be before the pardon? Still looks like quid pro quo to me. jhart3333 Apr 2016 #16
It *IS* quid pro quo, Ida was not suggesting otherwise dorkzilla Apr 2016 #17
Disagree. "Because they were friends" is not quid pro quo. 1 million dollars is. jhart3333 Apr 2016 #18
Please don't be so pedantic dorkzilla Apr 2016 #21
Not looking for a fight here. We're all on the same side. jhart3333 Apr 2016 #26
No worries! dorkzilla Apr 2016 #38
hey for a million dollars AgerolanAmerican Apr 2016 #27
Quid pro quo works both ways. It doesn't matter who does the favor first. nm rhett o rick Apr 2016 #44
Thank you and correct. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #22
Clinton Foundation founded 1997. 2cannan Apr 2016 #28
First line says 2001. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #54
Says 1997 at the top of page right under the logo. 2cannan Apr 2016 #58
Okay, I just followed links. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #65
I agree with you about it looking like a money laundering op, Ida. 2cannan Apr 2016 #67
The gift was to the Clinton library. JDPriestly Apr 2016 #37
Take what you want from this but... HillareeeHillaraah Apr 2016 #23
That pardon only took away jail time for NOT USING SHELL CORPORATIONS through Panama, et. al. Festivito Apr 2016 #24
You seem to forget the Clinton's were broke when they left the White House. Hillary said so. A Simple Game Apr 2016 #69
We will get an answer at the same time she releases her Wall Street transcripts. SoapBox Apr 2016 #25
As an atheist - "From your lips to god's ears"! ish of the hammer Apr 2016 #29
well, her supporters either support that kinda thing and worse stupidicus Apr 2016 #34
And Vince Foster gets his corpse paraded around in: 3, ... 2, ... baldguy Apr 2016 #35
And that is what we will have to live with until the November election and beyond if Hillary JDPriestly Apr 2016 #41
Well the Clintons certainly have a lot of baggage. And if the RW has so much on them, maybe Sanders rhett o rick Apr 2016 #47
When there's mudslinging going on, it's mudslingers that are to blame - not their target. baldguy Apr 2016 #62
Excuse Me? scottie55 Apr 2016 #70
The problem here isn't that you're being ripped off - the problem is that you're being played. baldguy Apr 2016 #75
The corpse has long been dusted off Blue_Adept Apr 2016 #50
And the Clintons had Ron Brown murdered! bluestateguy Apr 2016 #81
You must be a big Rudy Giuliani fan Buzz cook Apr 2016 #45
Why The Donation Then? scottie55 Apr 2016 #66
Well maybe there should be an investigation? Oh wait Buzz cook Apr 2016 #100
The corruption is blatant. Nt azmom Apr 2016 #55
How about you ask Bill instead of Hillary seeing as it was him who did the pardoning. Chicago1980 Apr 2016 #73
Bill / Hillary = Same Thing scottie55 Apr 2016 #74
When Bill said "2 for the price of 1" the emphasis was on PRICE! Divernan Apr 2016 #84
From wikipedia: marble falls Apr 2016 #86
Why are you working to get the GOP into the WH if Bernie is not the nominee? Jackie Wilson Said Apr 2016 #101
Bernie, why can't your wife find the tax returns? liberal N proud Apr 2016 #102
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Occupy Underground»Hillary - Why Did Bill Pa...»Reply #86