Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Occupy Underground
In reply to the discussion: Good LORD, they're out in force. [View all]grasswire
(50,130 posts)35. so this juror admits prejudice against you
...and says he will alert you just because of your "nonsense"
That juror should be struck from the pool. Is there no way to judge the jurors who exhibit bias and bigotry?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
216 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'll only do it when it's absolutely blatant and useless to any conversation. Which of course is not
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#2
Thanks; I know it means I'm doing something right, but this is what I'd expect from a RW
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#5
That's what's upset them; I was hidden in a Probama thread for stating facts regarding
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#8
:) I've never posted there although it's SOOOOO tempting. It's unbelievable.
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#62
In the BOG, a person can be blocked if they say something positive about a position taken by Obama -
AnotherMcIntosh
Aug 2013
#162
I remember that guy, the 2008 Obama for whom I voted. Wonder what happened to him. ;) n/t
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#170
Thanks. These are facts; we shouldn't even be arguing them, much less shouting them down
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#9
Actually, having presented such an inappropriate explanation, Juror #5 should be banned from ever be
emsimon33
Aug 2013
#86
I am sorry this happened, FWWM. Place has definitely changed in the last 10 years,
Mnemosyne
Aug 2013
#17
Sorry to hear it. I can't believe we'd have such trouble in an "underground" forum. n/t
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#19
not democratic, not rational, not logical--just pure nonsense. will be fun to see if juror 5
niyad
Aug 2013
#28
No, not democratic, and I among others have noticed that DUers, over the years, have
Nay
Aug 2013
#59
I bet a majority of Obama voters in 08 thought the 1% wouldn't be the winners when he won
DJ13
Aug 2013
#52
At first they're honest and learn it's a mistake, then use cannier methods. :(
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#117
There must be a very fine line between free speech and censorship or something;
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#118
Great observations and I agree. People cling to known structure in both political parties
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#120
Definitely agreed. It's an idea very worthy of consideration since Meta passed. n/t
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#121
Pathetic, rude and mean. I'd pull their juror eligibility. I like the DU member Fire Walk With Me.
NYC_SKP
Aug 2013
#97
They added Unrec, they killed Meta, they've polluted the Jury system...
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#126
Thank you very much. My skin is not incredibly thick and I doubt I'd like myself much if it were.
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#127
As there are trolls here from RW message boards, certainly there are those here simply to
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#128
More evidence that the jury system is fucked up. The irony of jurer 5. Jurer 5 should be alerted on
L0oniX
Aug 2013
#51
Jury transaparency. Remove the anonymous Jurer 1-6 , use DU member names and watch what happens.
L0oniX
Aug 2013
#113
I can see the fanatics adding to their list of enemies with that, for later pile ons.
RC
Aug 2013
#114
I agree that things are unDemocratic and that if user names were included, it would be different.
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#130
Thank you for the support and your work towards maintaining the presence of all voices
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#131
Perhaps :) There is a definite, orchestrated attempt to "weed out" the voices of which they do not
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#132
Yes, the name-calling does get to some people. I wouldn't even bother alerting on it, though...
truth2power
Aug 2013
#155
I'm really hoping you're wrong about Skinner and his plans for the forum. I hope that it is terribly
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#133
Which is decided unDemocratic, innit. :( Thanks for your work limpyhobbler. n/t
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#134
Thanks snappyturtle. It's not easy on the personal level. But as you so well describe, it's required
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#135
I've had the same thing happen. I stated FACTS and the haters couldn't take it.
LaydeeBug
Aug 2013
#67
Thanks. You'd hope that on a left-wing board or group or political party, there wouldn't BE
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#136
You are most certainly welcome. Haters are gonna hate, honey, it's what they *do*
LaydeeBug
Aug 2013
#168
I have to agree with you. From what you post I'd have to say you were hit by lightening twice.
marble falls
Aug 2013
#68
Then this OP was alerted upon (yeah, by a member of this group, sure). :(
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#137
There is a technique called "dictionary flaming" where a posted presents many points
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#139
That's not an appropriate message whether you are a Koch propagandist or not
Renew Deal
Aug 2013
#73
Interesting, thank you :) I've never "fit in" and doubt I ever will so I'll suppose that it's to be
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#140
Thank you. Here's hoping sanity prevails and inconvenient truths "are allowed". n/t
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#141
Al Gore with his Inconvenient Truth was shunned...why "they" do this is beyond me.
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#143
Name calling and not being willing to at least listen to the other side never help
emsimon33
Aug 2013
#179
Thanks. I agree that bullying and targeting are NOT liberal/democratic values. n/t
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#144
Thank you! Meta became its own circle of hell after a while, with Purity Control perched therein
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#123
Drunken Irishman makes it clear he has no compassion for the homeless or "mentally weak"
bananas
Aug 2013
#107
It sucks for someone to use their Jury powers that way: i.e. to be abusive, hateful, name calling
99th_Monkey
Aug 2013
#104
They are apparently picking at me using something I dislike- name-calling, personal attacks, etc.
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#145
Thank you. It's important because it's plainly obvious some wish certain truths not be told.
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#146
I believe it's a planned set of personal attacks, all very similar in being dismissive, name-calling
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#147
It looks to me like a coordinated effort. After Meta was closed down because the bullies
rhett o rick
Aug 2013
#125
"If the future of America is given to them, watch it go over Niagara Falls..." ~Dead Kennedys
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#184
I've set up some chairs and a reading lamp and air conditioning and even a snack bar
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#181
Isn't it against the DU bylaws to insult other DU members? I count approximately 5 insults in that
Lint Head
Aug 2013
#176
Yesterday I was specifically, personally insulted by at least five different DUers.
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#177
I hope you alerted on the jury results - that would take it to straight to the Admins.
scarletwoman
Aug 2013
#193
Some how I knew you would be celebrating. No place for those that dont agree. nm
rhett o rick
Aug 2013
#203
Go ahead and ridicule and mock. And as far as him being anti-semitic, I dont
rhett o rick
Aug 2013
#211
You do know he was PPR'd. For being anti-semitic of all things. How ironic. nm
rhett o rick
Aug 2013
#206
Beware, "They are out in force". They are looking to purify DU. Smite those that speak out. nm
rhett o rick
Aug 2013
#212