Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DU Community Help

consider_this

(2,835 posts)

3. Hmmm -

Reply to Shermann (Reply #1)

Tue Nov 23, 2021, 05:23 PM

Nov 2021

I didn't think that one had enough in it, that would cause a juror to find factually false info guilty of breaking that rule. Especially if the juror does not realize it is false. I feel like something is needed to call attention to the idea that info is false.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What to do about False info postings? [View all] consider_this Nov 2021 OP

The rules against right-wing talking points and kooky content cover a wide enough range for DU nt Shermann Nov 2021 #1

Hmmm - consider_this Nov 2021 #3

100% agree obamanut2012 Dec 2021 #8

There are double messages sometimes bucolic_frolic Nov 2021 #2

Start by replying to the post expressing why you think it's wrong. Hoyt Nov 2021 #4

Doesn't work. BlackSkimmer Nov 2021 #5

Maybe, but alerting because you disagree with, or don't understand, someone's post ain't way either. Hoyt Nov 2021 #6

I'm not talking about alerting for disagreeing. I hope people don't do that. BlackSkimmer Nov 2021 #7

I'd go one better CloudWatcher Dec 2021 #9