Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DU Community Help

question everything

(49,219 posts)

5. The "defendant" was not a spammer, but reacted to the one who was

Reply to Rhiannon12866 (Reply #4)

Mon May 2, 2022, 07:45 PM

May 2022

and whose OP was removed.

The "charge" was no personal attack, I think, or no bigotry.

The "offensive" post was something like: "this is your first post and you are going after a Democratic leader?", or something..

Once I saw that the whole thread would be locked, I did not see any reason to proceed.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Jury for a post on a closed thread? [View all] question everything May 2022 OP

You are correct. LetMyPeopleVote May 2022 #1

The MIRT team moderators removed the post (and the poster) before the jury had to rule. Eugene May 2022 #2

I think I got invited to that same jury BlueGreenLady May 2022 #3

If a Spammer or disruptor posted on the thread before it was removed, they can still post elsewhere Rhiannon12866 May 2022 #4

The "defendant" was not a spammer, but reacted to the one who was question everything May 2022 #5

Okay, If the poster was objecting to a removed post, that does make sense Rhiannon12866 May 2022 #6