Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

usonian

(15,271 posts)
22. Replying to my own post.
Wed May 4, 2022, 06:06 PM
May 2022

The point is that as a creator, YOU should be paid directly by readers, i.e. via some micro-payment.

That point seems to have been missed.

How and why this doesn't work is a tech and social engineering issue beyond the scope here.

Pay YOU and not some (Bezos, Musk, Whoever owns NYT, Murdoch) whose only goal is to make as much money as possible and/or control the conversation for subscription money or ad payments (ads are poison by the way)
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/oct/24/advertising-poison-hooked

AND people pay you for QUALITY, not VIRALITY/QUANTITY. There's your dumbing down and poison.

If it's garbage, then the yokels aren't going to pay a micronickel for it. Garbage demands to be free.

Quality allows it, PROVIDING your "editor" or "owner" wouldn't take the lion's share, AND control your content.

Nothing is free. When you see ads You are the Product. But people don't mind spending (micro-nickels) for quality.
IF THEY HAVE A CHANCE.

Damned if I am going to open up 20 different accounts, each one more likely to spill my credit card info than the other.

If you are a quality creator, you deserve to be paid. But the gatekeepers want that damn tap in your veins, all 20, 30, 100 taps.

The old business models survive by brute force and by subverting real positive and liberating change.

Frickin artists have to die before their works are worth anything.

I'd send you a micro-nickel right now but there's NO DAMN WAY that's practical.

Peace,
and have a great day

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

How to post a non-paywall link [View all] intrepidity May 2022 OP
Great post, intrepidity, thanks! JudyM May 2022 #1
Articles are paywalled for a reason AZSkiffyGeek May 2022 #2
I *do* believe in paying them intrepidity May 2022 #4
So you steal articles you can't pay for? AZSkiffyGeek May 2022 #5
Or read it at the library. TreasonousBastard May 2022 #6
That's a complex topic intrepidity May 2022 #7
Why someplace else? AZSkiffyGeek May 2022 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author Journeyman May 2022 #3
The internet SHOULD and COULD allow direct payment to creators. usonian May 2022 #9
Stealing is okay because big corporations gatekeepers and "truth"? AZSkiffyGeek May 2022 #10
I suspect (and hope) you used those two years of UI payments intrepidity May 2022 #12
So let me get this straight... AZSkiffyGeek May 2022 #13
No. I'm pointing to the need for a massive overhaul to the system intrepidity May 2022 #15
Okay, so it should be free because there isn't UBI? AZSkiffyGeek May 2022 #17
I hear your pain. intrepidity May 2022 #18
Thanks; and that is just one important aspect of this very complex issue intrepidity May 2022 #11
Oh, so stealing is okay because people lie AZSkiffyGeek May 2022 #14
I also pay for a WaPo subscription intrepidity May 2022 #16
So you're willing to pay, but don't think you should? AZSkiffyGeek May 2022 #19
....because I know what it's like to not be able to afford to... nt intrepidity May 2022 #20
I do too... AZSkiffyGeek May 2022 #21
Replying to my own post. usonian May 2022 #22
Pools CloudWatcher May 2022 #23
The internet was supposed to be this one to one thing. usonian May 2022 #24
Latest Discussions»Help & Search»DU Community Help»How to post a non-paywall...»Reply #22